[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-319) Reword part of the @Vetoed section

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Martin Kouba updated CDI-319: ----------------------------- Description: I think the current wording of 3.13 "Vetoing types" is misleading now. E.g. @Vetoed on annotation (qualifier, stereotype) has no effect. Also the spec wording should be synced with @Vetoed javadoc. To sum it up: @Vetoed affects classes, interfaces, enums. * class -> no container lifecycle event (PAT), no bean or observer methods defined by the class will be installed * interface, enum -> no container lifecycle event (PAT) I suggest something similar: {quote} Any Java class, interface, enum or package may be prevented from being considered by CDI by adding the @Vetoed annotation. In particular, * any beans or observer methods defined by a class annotated with @Vetoed will not be installed * no container lifecycle events are fired for classes, interfaces or enums annotated with @Vetoed * when @Vetoed placed on package, all classes, interfaces or enums in the package are prevented from being considered by CDI {quote} The rest is ok. was:We should probably change the "3.12 Vetoing types" section title back to "Vetoing beans" and sync the spec wording with *@Vetoed javadoc* (which makes it clear). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira