Folks, I fear there is another issue:
Are dots in EL names even allowed? I think not.
Please read up EL-3.0
1.6 Operators [] and .
The EL follows ECMAScript in unifying the treatment of the . and [] operators.
And in ECMAScript dots are afaik _not_ allowed in names!
If it works in some implementations then that is fine, but it is not required by the spec
-> non portable. We must not require this in CDI!
Gonna ping the servlet EG to get this confirmed.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 2 January 2015, 12:50, Mark Struberg
<struberg(a)yahoo.de> wrote:
> Forget it, I found it. Maybe I had some typo in my grep...
LieGrue,
strub
> On Friday, 2 January 2015, 11:59, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
wrote:
> > I've grepped all the cdi spec project and this string doesn't
appear.
> When did this got added?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Friday, 2 January 2015, 8:15, Tomas Remes <tremes(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>> >
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've checked the related TCK test and it seems to me valid. In CDI
spec
>
>> there is:
>>
>> "6.7.5. The Conversation interface
>> The container provides a built-in bean with bean type Conversation ,
scope
>> @RequestScoped ,
>> and qualifier @Default , named javax.enterprise.context.conversation
> ."
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
>> To: "Antonio Goncalves" <antonio.goncalves(a)gmail.com>,
>> "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com>
>> Cc: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:57:28 AM
>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] where is defined
>> javax.enterprise.context.conversation.id?
>>
>> cid is a different thing. But I did nowhere (spec and api) find the
one
>> mentioned by Romain.
>> So I think it's not specified and we need to exclude this test.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, 29 December 2014, 21:41, Antonio Goncalves
>> <antonio.goncalves(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing in JSF nor in Servlet, but in CDI 1.2 Specification :
>>>
>>>
>>> 6.7.4. Conversation context lifecycle
>>> (...)
>>> The long-running conversation associated with a
>>> request may be propagated to any Servlet request via use of a
request
>> parameter named cid
>>> containing the unique identifier of the conversation. In this
case, the
>
>> application must manage this
>>> request parameter.
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> This is accomplished via use of a request parameter named cid
> containing the
>> unique
>>> identifier of the conversation.
>>> (...)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys
>>>>
>>>> didnt find in CDI and JSF PDFs where is defined
>>>> "javax.enterprise.context.conversation.id". Seems it
> should be
>>>> available in ELs.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any pointer please?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>
http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>
https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>>
>>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
licenses
> the
>> code under the Apache License, Version 2
>> (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided
>> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
> property
>> rights inherent in such information.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Antonio Goncalves
>>> Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
>>>
>>> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Pluralsight | Paris JUG | Devoxx
France
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>
>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
licenses the
> code
>> under the Apache License, Version 2
>> (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided
>> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
> property
>> rights inherent in such information.
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the
> code
>> under the Apache License, Version 2
>> (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided
>> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
> property
>> rights inherent in such information.
>>
>
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
under the Apache License, Version 2
(
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided
on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property
rights inherent in such information.