]
Matej Novotny commented on CDI-590:
-----------------------------------
[~rmannibucau] got it now, or at least I hope so. Thanks for clarification.
It is indeed an interesting idea and certainly matches the use-case. Although leaving the
type-safe check on user side (since it will be handled in producers) might yield...various
results :)
Provide a way to produce any type in a producer
-----------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-590
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-590
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Epic
Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
Note: this is a follow up "adding generic producers to CDI 2.0?" thread on the
list
It is common to rely on a subsystem (another IoC, a coercing system, ...) to produce
values. Today a producer can't say "I produce anything in a safe" manner.
Idea would be for injection point aware producers with a qualifier to producer Object and
match all types.
It needs another flag (can be in @Qualifier or another annotation it is not really
important) to say "I produce safely any type".
I did a PoC on github:
https://github.com/rmannibucau/generic-producer-cdi but think it
can be a nice feature of CDI 2.0 since it would avoid users to have to dig into extensions
for several simple cases (configuration, bridge to other IoC...)