Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cdi-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org You can reach the person managing the list at cdi-dev-owner(a)lists.jboss.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..." Today's Topics: 1. No meeting today (Antoine Sabot-Durand) 2. [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-519) Instance.destroy() cannot be used for dependent bean instances not created by the same Instance object (Martin Kouba (JIRA)) 3. Specializing producer methods & qualifiers (Christian Kaltepoth) 4. Re: Specializing producer methods & qualifiers (Jozef Hartinger) 5. Re: Specializing producer methods & qualifiers (Christian Kaltepoth) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:53:22 +0200 From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Subject: [cdi-dev] No meeting today To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Message-ID: <DAB22B90-65CE-4B50-84EC-3A718DA040FC(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all, I?ll be on Devoxx France rehearsal today (giving a 3 hrs university tomorrow) and won?t be available for the meeting. See you next week Antoine -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150407/95cc5f91/at... ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 05:18:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Martin Kouba (JIRA)" <issues(a)jboss.org&gt; Subject: [cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-519) Instance.destroy() cannot be used for dependent bean instances not created by the same Instance object To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Message-ID: <JIRA.12567996.1428571044000.66471.1428571098459(a)Atlassian.JIRA&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Martin Kouba created CDI-519: -------------------------------- Summary: Instance.destroy() cannot be used for dependent bean instances not created by the same Instance object Key: CDI-519 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-519 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Affects Versions: 1.2.Final Reporter: Martin Kouba 5.6.1. The Instance interface: {quote} The method destroy() instructs the container to destroy the instance. The bean instance passed to destroy() should be *a dependent scoped bean instance*, or... {quote} I think this should be more obvious. E.g. this wouldn't work correctly even though it doesn't violate the spec: {code:java} @Dependent class Bar { } class Foo { @Inject Instance<Bar> instance; void ping() { instance.destroy(CDI.current().select(Bar.class).get()); } } {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341) ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:13:01 +0200 From: Christian Kaltepoth <christian(a)kaltepoth.de&gt; Subject: [cdi-dev] Specializing producer methods & qualifiers To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Message-ID: < CAEXeC6yYV-NmJ35M0v8d8icjtM57Zw20EuF92Bq2jVc80EPpzQ(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hey all, I've a question regarding specializing qualified producer methods. It would be great to get your opinion on this. Imaging this producer method: public class MyProducer { @Produces @MyQualifier public Something produce() { // ... } } Now imagine the producer method is specialized like this: public class MyExtendedProducer extends MyProducer { @Override @Produces @Specializes public Something produce() { // ... } } Please not that I NOT added @MyQualifier to the specializing producer method. Now for this injection point: @Inject @MyQualifier private Something something; What is expected to happen according to the spec? Will the specialized producer be used or not? Thanks Christian -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal GitHub: https://github.com/chkal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150414/023eaca3/at... ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:26:11 +0200 From: Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com&gt; Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Specializing producer methods & qualifiers To: Christian Kaltepoth <christian(a)kaltepoth.de&gt;, cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Message-ID: <552CB303.1080904(a)redhat.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Hi Christian, yes, the specializing producer inherits all the qualifiers of the specialized producer. Furthermore, if the specialized producer had defined a name, this would have been inherited as well (even without explicit declaration on MyExtendedProducer.produce()). See http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#direct_and_indirect_spec... for details. Jozef On 04/14/2015 06:13 AM, Christian Kaltepoth wrote: > Hey all, > > I've a question regarding specializing qualified producer methods. It > would be great to get your opinion on this. > > Imaging this producer method: > > public class MyProducer { > @Produces > @MyQualifier > public Something produce() { > // ... > } > } > > Now imagine the producer method is specialized like this: > > public class MyExtendedProducer extends MyProducer { > @Override > @Produces > @Specializes > public Something produce() { > // ... > } > } > > Please not that I NOT added @MyQualifier to the specializing producer > method. > > Now for this injection point: > > @Inject > @MyQualifier > private Something something; > > What is expected to happen according to the spec? Will the specialized > producer be used or not? > > Thanks > > Christian > > > -- > Christian Kaltepoth > Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal > GitHub: https://github.com/chkal > > > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150414/25b037a6/at... ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:55:39 +0200 From: Christian Kaltepoth <christian(a)kaltepoth.de&gt; Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Specializing producer methods & qualifiers To: Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Message-ID: <CAEXeC6yno=tr= rm2rfg5HDap8Aw7anV9jfatSioEhbckpabuGA(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi Jozef, thanks a lot for your response. So if I read this correctly, the qualifier doesn't need to be annotated with @Inherited for this behavior. Is that correct? Christian 2015-04-14 8:26 GMT+02:00 Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com&gt;: > Hi Christian, > > yes, the specializing producer inherits all the qualifiers of the > specialized producer. Furthermore, if the specialized producer had defined > a name, this would have been inherited as well (even without explicit > declaration on MyExtendedProducer.produce()). See > http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#direct_and_indirect_spec... > for details. > > Jozef > > > On 04/14/2015 06:13 AM, Christian Kaltepoth wrote: > > Hey all, > > I've a question regarding specializing qualified producer methods. It > would be great to get your opinion on this. > > Imaging this producer method: > > public class MyProducer { > @Produces > @MyQualifier > public Something produce() { > // ... > } > } > > Now imagine the producer method is specialized like this: > > public class MyExtendedProducer extends MyProducer { > @Override > @Produces > @Specializes > public Something produce() { > // ... > } > } > > Please not that I NOT added @MyQualifier to the specializing producer > method. > > Now for this injection point: > > @Inject > @MyQualifier > private Something something; > > What is expected to happen according to the spec? Will the specialized > producer be used or not? > > Thanks > > Christian > > > -- > Christian Kaltepoth > Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal > GitHub: https://github.com/chkal > > > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing listcdi-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps:// lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > > > -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal GitHub: https://github.com/chkal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150414/289a422b/at... ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 53, Issue 11 ***************************************