June 2011 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Commented: (CDI-27) Support declarative transactions on managed beans

by Adam Bien (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Adam Bien commented on CDI-27: ------------------------------ Mark, but just introducing another, semantic identical annotation to @TransactionAttribute, to CDI is even worse. IMHO eliminating overlap between the specs is crucial > Support declarative transactions on managed beans > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-27 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-27 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Java EE integration > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Commented: (CDI-27) Support declarative transactions on managed beans

by Mark Struberg (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Mark Struberg commented on CDI-27: ---------------------------------- Pete, does this issue mean to support EJBs @TransactionAttribute and stuff out of the box? This would require a very deep integration with the EJB container and the support of various transaction models. Not sure if we really like to dig that deep. This is workwise basically a duplication of the EJB spec in this area. But technically it would be different because in EJB transactions are auto-on whereas in CDI they would still need to get applied automatically. > Support declarative transactions on managed beans > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-27 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-27 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Java EE integration > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Yan:: Re: About ProcessSessionBean<X> Container Lifecycle Event Class

by Gurkan Erdogdu

Pete i think that this is not related with the local interfaces. ProcessSessionBean event is fired for every X where X is a session bean class Pzt, 13 Haz 2011 14:23 EEST tarihinde Pete Muir şöyle yazdı: >I'm not actually sure, as X always refers to the bean class, rather than anything to do with the local interfaces. Any EJB expert (cc'ing Marina, David, Carlo, Jaikiran :-) able to shed light? > >On 13 Jun 2011, at 11:46, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In the 1.0 specification, Chapter 11.5.8, ProcessSessionBean<X> container event class was defined as >> >> public interface ProcessSessionBean<X> extends ProcessManagedBean<Object> { >> public String getEjbName(); >> public SessionBeanType getSessionBeanType(); >> } >> >> As I commented in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-215, it is more accurate to define this interface as >> >> public interface ProcessSessionBean<X> extends ProcessManagedBean<X>{ >> .... >> } >> >> WDYT? >> >> --Gurkan Erdogdu >> Founder and PMC Chair, Apache OpenWebBeans >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >

13 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

About ProcessSessionBean<X> Container Lifecycle Event Class

by Gurkan Erdogdu

Hello, In the 1.0 specification, Chapter 11.5.8, ProcessSessionBean<X> container event class was defined as public interface ProcessSessionBean<X> extends ProcessManagedBean<Object> { public String getEjbName(); public SessionBeanType getSessionBeanType(); } As I commented in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-215, it is more accurate to define this interface as public interface ProcessSessionBean<X> extends ProcessManagedBean<X>{ .... } WDYT? --Gurkan Erdogdu Founder and PMC Chair, Apache OpenWebBeans

13 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

CDI-110

by George Gastaldi

Hello, I created a pull request on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-110 waiting for approval: https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/28 Regards, George Gastaldi

13 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-105) Provide a means for portable extensions to access beans.xml files

by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)

Provide a means for portable extensions to access beans.xml files ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-105 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-105 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Stuart Douglas There is currently no portable way for extensions to get access to beans.xml files installed in WEB-INF/lib, as CDI starts up before the ServletContext is availible. This would be useful for extensions that wish to add extra information to beans.xml in a different namespace. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

4
16
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Closed: (CDI-78) Clarify how isDelegate() behaves on InjectionPoint, and what happens when an InjectionPoint is injected into a Decorator

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir closed CDI-78. ------------------------ Resolution: Done > Clarify how isDelegate() behaves on InjectionPoint, and what happens when an InjectionPoint is injected into a Decorator > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: CDI-78 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-78 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Decorators > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Confirmed) > > > The InjectionPoint should be that of the injection into the consumer, and isDelegate() should return false. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Closed: (CDI-73) Specify that the BM should be available from the Servlet context for ease of access

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir closed CDI-73. ------------------------ Resolution: Done > Specify that the BM should be available from the Servlet context for ease of access > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-73 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-73 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Java EE integration > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Confirmed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Closed: (CDI-58) Clarify that there can be multiple AnnotatedType instances per Java class

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir closed CDI-58. ------------------------ Resolution: Done > Clarify that there can be multiple AnnotatedType instances per Java class > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-58 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-58 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans, Portable Extensions > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Confirmed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Closed: (CDI-7) Section 10.2, bullet 3, first paragraph contradicts the rest of the section

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-7?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.syst... ] Pete Muir closed CDI-7. ----------------------- Resolution: Done Marius' pull is merged > Section 10.2, bullet 3, first paragraph contradicts the rest of the section > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-7 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-7 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Events > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Marius Bogoevici > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 1.1 (Confirmed) > > > "The observer method has all the event qualifiers." > This contradicts the examples (section 10.2.3) and the use of @Any, all of which indicate that less specific observer methods are also invoked. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev June 2011