September 2012 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-74) State explicitely that Decorators must be implemented using subclassing

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-74: ------------------------------ Please review https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/117 > State explicitely that Decorators must be implemented using subclassing > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-74 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-74 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Decorators > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Marius Bogoevici > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > > Subclassing should be mandatory for Decorators of managed beans which are not session beans (no restrictions in the case of the latter). > This ensures that: > (1) fields on pseudo scoped managed beans are accessible > (2) there's no restriction on what kinds of constructors may a managed bean have > (3) no extra bean instances are created when a managed bean is created -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-74) State explicitely that Decorators must be implemented using subclassing

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir updated CDI-74: ------------------------- Description: Subclassing should be mandatory for Decorators of managed beans which are not session beans (no restrictions in the case of the latter). This ensures that: (1) fields on pseudo scoped managed beans are accessible (2) there's no restriction on what kinds of constructors may a managed bean have (3) no extra bean instances are created when a managed bean is created was: Subclassing should be mandatory for Decorators of managed beans which are not session beans (no restrictions in the case of the latter). This ensures that: - fields on pseudo scoped managed beans are accessible - there's no restriction on what kinds of constructors may a managed bean have - no extra bean instances are created when a managed bean is created Forum Reference: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/2010-May/002506.html (was: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/2010-May/002506.html) > State explicitely that Decorators must be implemented using subclassing > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-74 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-74 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Decorators > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Marius Bogoevici > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > Subclassing should be mandatory for Decorators of managed beans which are not session beans (no restrictions in the case of the latter). > This ensures that: > (1) fields on pseudo scoped managed beans are accessible > (2) there's no restriction on what kinds of constructors may a managed bean have > (3) no extra bean instances are created when a managed bean is created -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-74) State explicitely that Decorators must be implemented using subclassing

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-74: ------------------------------ Working through this: (1) I have clarified that due CDI-6, produce must return an instance that can be reflected on (2) There is currently no restriction on what kind of constructor a dependent scoped bean may have, but I will try to explicitly state this (3) I'm not we can specify this, it's really an impl issue > State explicitely that Decorators must be implemented using subclassing > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-74 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-74 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Decorators > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Marius Bogoevici > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > Subclassing should be mandatory for Decorators of managed beans which are not session beans (no restrictions in the case of the latter). > This ensures that: > - fields on pseudo scoped managed beans are accessible > - there's no restriction on what kinds of constructors may a managed bean have > - no extra bean instances are created when a managed bean is created -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-157) Enabling/Disabling Extensions

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

Enabling/Disabling Extensions ----------------------------- Key: CDI-157 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-157 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Pete Muir Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

3
9
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-221) Throw definition error if the set of decorated types of a decorator is empty

by Marko Lukša (JIRA)

Marko Lukša created CDI-221: ------------------------------- Summary: Throw definition error if the set of decorated types of a decorator is empty Key: CDI-221 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-221 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Marko Lukša I propose the following addition to section 8.1: "If the set of decorated types of a decorator is empty, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error." This would be helpful in cases where the developer is not aware that a decorator and decorated bean must share the same interface, and thinks that a decorator can be defined simply by extending the decorated class (as in the following example). {code} public class MyBean { public Object foo() {...} } @Decorator public class MyDecorator extends MyBean { @Inject @Delegate MyBean delegate; public Object foo() {...} } {code} Even though the spec does explicitly state that "superclasses are not decorated types of the decorator", throwing an error would probably save some people's debugging time. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

2
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-207) Specify @Destroyed event payload type for a timed-out conversation

by Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)

Specify @Destroyed event payload type for a timed-out conversation ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: CDI-207 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-207 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Contexts Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR1 Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) {quote}An event with the ServletRequestEvent as the payload and with qualifier @Initialized(ConversationContext.class) is fired when the conversation context is initialized and an event with qualifier @Destroyed(ConversationContext.class) when the conversation context is destroyed.{quote} ServletRequestEvent is not available when a conversation is destroyed due to time-out. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

3
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-219) Support Request Scope for EJB @Singleton @PostConstruct methods

by Guido Bonazza (JIRA)

Guido Bonazza created CDI-219: --------------------------------- Summary: Support Request Scope for EJB @Singleton @PostConstruct methods Key: CDI-219 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-219 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Contexts, Java EE integration Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Guido Bonazza A Request context should be available in @PostConstruct methods of EJB Singletons. This is a completion of section 6.7.1 of the CDI 1.0 spec, which covers @Asynchronous and @Timeout EJB methods. Probably the container should ensure that a new context is always created for the @PostConstruct invocation, to be coherent with section 4.8.3 of the EJB 3.1 spec, which specifies the transactional behavior of @Singleton @PostConstruct. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

5
21
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-75) Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir updated CDI-75: ------------------------- Fix Version/s: 1.1.PRD (was: 1.1 (Proposed)) Forum Reference: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/2010-April/002425.html (was: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/2010-April/002425.html) > Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-75 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Events > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-42) Allow you to inject the intercepted bean into an Interceptor

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir updated CDI-42: ------------------------- Fix Version/s: 1.1.PRD (was: 1.1 (Proposed)) > Allow you to inject the intercepted bean into an Interceptor > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: CDI-42 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-42 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Interceptors > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Marius Bogoevici > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-42) Allow you to inject the intercepted bean into an Interceptor

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir updated CDI-42: ------------------------- Assignee: Pete Muir (was: Marius Bogoevici) > Allow you to inject the intercepted bean into an Interceptor > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: CDI-42 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-42 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Interceptors > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev September 2012