September 2012 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-42) Allow you to inject the intercepted bean into an Interceptor

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-42: ------------------------------ Please review my pull request at https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/113 > Allow you to inject the intercepted bean into an Interceptor > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: CDI-42 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-42 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Interceptors > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Marius Bogoevici > Fix For: 1.1.PRD > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

CDI 1.1 dates - please review and let us know any issues!

by Pete Muir

Hi all, I've been working with Oracle to establish a timeline for completing CDI 1.1, so that we can get it included in Java EE 7. Here is the proposal, that will allow us to align with Java EE 7. Public review draft: Oct 20 Public review starts: Nov 1 Public review done: Dec 1 PFD submitted: Feb 12 Final ballot: Feb 19 Release: March 15 Pete

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

CDI 1.1 dates - please review and let us know any issues!

by Pete Muir

Hi all, I've been working with Oracle to establish a timeline for completing CDI 1.1, so that we can get it included in Java EE 7. Here is the proposal, that will allow us to align with Java EE 7. Public review draft: Oct 20 Public review starts: Nov 1 Public review done: Dec 1 PFD submitted: Feb 12 Final ballot: Feb 19 Release: March 15 Pete

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-1) Clarify how resource producer fields (for persistence contexts) interact with transaction propagation

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.syst... ] Pete Muir resolved CDI-1. ------------------------- Assignee: Pete Muir Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1 (Proposed)) Resolution: Rejected > Clarify how resource producer fields (for persistence contexts) interact with transaction propagation > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-1 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-1 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Java EE integration > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-75) Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event

by Martin Kouba (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Martin Kouba commented on CDI-75: --------------------------------- Hm, I think *IF_CONTEXT_ACTIVE* would be consistent with IF_EXISTS. It's quite logical to have IF_EXISTS instead of IF_BEAN_INSTANCE_EXISTS because you define the observer "in the context" of the bean implementation. Thus it's also logical to explicitly state the reception refers to bean impl. context. Just my 2c. > Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-75 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Events > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-1) Clarify how resource producer fields (for persistence contexts) interact with transaction propagation

by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.syst... ] Stuart Douglas commented on CDI-1: ---------------------------------- I am ok with rejecting it. > Clarify how resource producer fields (for persistence contexts) interact with transaction propagation > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-1 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-1 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Java EE integration > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-75) Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-75: ------------------------------ I've created a proposal in https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/112 based on this discussion. Please review. > Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-75 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Events > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-75) Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-75: ------------------------------ Issue with CONTEXT_ACTIVE is that it's not consistent with IF_EXISTS (it would be consistent with EXISTS)... I'll go with IF_ACTIVE for now > Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-75 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Events > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-1) Clarify how resource producer fields (for persistence contexts) interact with transaction propagation

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.syst... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-1: ----------------------------- I think this is sufficiently covered by 7.3.6 "For an entity manager associated with a resource definition, it must behave as though it were injected directly using @PersistencContext." Stuart I would suggest we reject this issue, unless you object. > Clarify how resource producer fields (for persistence contexts) interact with transaction propagation > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-1 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-1 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Java EE integration > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-75) Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event

by Jens Schumann (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Jens Schumann commented on CDI-75: ---------------------------------- Array sounds good to me too. I would have complained about illegal combinations as Martin already did. Regarding names: CONTEXT_ACTIVE? > Clarify what happens to a bean which belongs to inactive when it observes an event > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-75 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-75 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Events > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev September 2012