February 2013 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-304) Clarify Producers for injection into generic types

by Mark Struberg (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Mark Struberg edited comment on CDI-304 at 2/12/13 3:09 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------ sounds like a good solution. But we should also check what happens if there are ambiguous situations. E.g. if you have multiple Producer methods which map to different generic types of the same base type. In other words we might need to enhance the BeanManager#getBeans() or #resolve(), isn't? was (Author: struberg): sounds like a good solution. But we should also check what happens if there are ambiguous situations. E.g. if you have multiple Producer methods which map. In other words we might need to enhance the BeanManager#resolve(), isn't? > Clarify Producers for injection into generic types > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-304 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans > Affects Versions: 1.1.PRD > Reporter: Mark Struberg > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > There is a discussion over in DeltaSpike whether an injection point > {code} > @Inject > private JsfMessage<SomeMessageClass>; > {code} > with a producer method > {code} > @Produces @Dependent > JsfMessage createMessage(InjectionPoint ip) > {code} > 5.2 imo only defines the other way around. Having a raw type at the injection point and a parameterized producer method. > We should define how this is intended to work. > Please note that the producer above works in all existing containers so far but not in Weld2-beta1. > Here is the link to the DS issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-295 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-304) Clarify Producers for injection into generic types

by Mark Struberg (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Mark Struberg commented on CDI-304: ----------------------------------- sounds like a good solution. But we should also check what happens if there are ambiguous situations. E.g. if you have multiple Producer methods which map. In other words we might need to enhance the BeanManager#resolve(), isn't? > Clarify Producers for injection into generic types > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-304 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans > Affects Versions: 1.1.PRD > Reporter: Mark Struberg > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > There is a discussion over in DeltaSpike whether an injection point > {code} > @Inject > private JsfMessage<SomeMessageClass>; > {code} > with a producer method > {code} > @Produces @Dependent > JsfMessage createMessage(InjectionPoint ip) > {code} > 5.2 imo only defines the other way around. Having a raw type at the injection point and a parameterized producer method. > We should define how this is intended to work. > Please note that the producer above works in all existing containers so far but not in Weld2-beta1. > Here is the link to the DS issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-295 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-304) Clarify Producers for injection into generic types

by Martin Kouba (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Martin Kouba commented on CDI-304: ---------------------------------- I can't but agree.. > Clarify Producers for injection into generic types > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-304 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans > Affects Versions: 1.1.PRD > Reporter: Mark Struberg > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > There is a discussion over in DeltaSpike whether an injection point > {code} > @Inject > private JsfMessage<SomeMessageClass>; > {code} > with a producer method > {code} > @Produces @Dependent > JsfMessage createMessage(InjectionPoint ip) > {code} > 5.2 imo only defines the other way around. Having a raw type at the injection point and a parameterized producer method. > We should define how this is intended to work. > Please note that the producer above works in all existing containers so far but not in Weld2-beta1. > Here is the link to the DS issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-295 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-58) Clarify that there can be multiple AnnotatedType instances per Java class

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir updated CDI-58: ------------------------- Fix Version/s: 1.1.PFD (was: 1.1 (Proposed)) > Clarify that there can be multiple AnnotatedType instances per Java class > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-58 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-58 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans, Portable Extensions > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.1.PFD > > > This decision is really important to make. Either we remove/redefine BeanManager#getAnnoatadType(Class) or we remove the 'artificial annotated types'. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-58) Clarify that there can be multiple AnnotatedType instances per Java class

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-58: ------------------------------ Please review https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/160 which covers this and CDI-83. > Clarify that there can be multiple AnnotatedType instances per Java class > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-58 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-58 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans, Portable Extensions > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > This decision is really important to make. Either we remove/redefine BeanManager#getAnnoatadType(Class) or we remove the 'artificial annotated types'. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Cancelled: CDI 1.1 weekly meeting

by pmuir＠redhat.com

A single instance of a recurring meeting has been cancelled. Subject: CDI 1.1 weekly meeting Organiser: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> Time: Monday, 11 February 2013, 17:00:00 GMT+00:00 - 19:00:00 GMT+00:00 Invitees: Joseph Bergmark/Durham/IBM <bergmark(a)us.ibm.com>, "cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>, Mike Brock <cbrock(a)redhat.com> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Fixing the time of the meeting post DST changes in UK/something going wrong with the invite! Weekly CDI 1.1 meeting http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?iso=20120803T15&p1=0... We will try to use Google Hangout, join #jsr346 10 minutes before the meeting to request an invite. Otherwise switch to the phone teleconference, see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0ApqHbXzB1R1gdGRFWXB4TVpNeWFJ... for details.

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-83) Clarify that BeanManager.createAnnotatedType() should return any modifications made by lifecycle events.

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir updated CDI-83: ------------------------- Fix Version/s: 1.1.PFD (was: 1.1 (Proposed)) Please review https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/160 > Clarify that BeanManager.createAnnotatedType() should return any modifications made by lifecycle events. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-83 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-83 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Portable Extensions > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.PFD > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-304) Clarify Producers for injection into generic types

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-304: ------------------------------- Per JLS 5.1.9 "Use of an unchecked conversion generates a mandatory compile-time warning" (this is a unchecked conversion), therefore, I think CDI should do just the same. It should work, but generate a warning. WDYT? > Clarify Producers for injection into generic types > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-304 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans > Affects Versions: 1.1.PRD > Reporter: Mark Struberg > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > There is a discussion over in DeltaSpike whether an injection point > {code} > @Inject > private JsfMessage<SomeMessageClass>; > {code} > with a producer method > {code} > @Produces @Dependent > JsfMessage createMessage(InjectionPoint ip) > {code} > 5.2 imo only defines the other way around. Having a raw type at the injection point and a parameterized producer method. > We should define how this is intended to work. > Please note that the producer above works in all existing containers so far but not in Weld2-beta1. > Here is the link to the DS issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-295 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-304) Clarify Producers for injection into generic types

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-304: ------------------------------- This should be pretty easy to decide on, we just do the same as the assignability in Java itself. > Clarify Producers for injection into generic types > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-304 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-304 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans > Affects Versions: 1.1.PRD > Reporter: Mark Struberg > Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) > > > There is a discussion over in DeltaSpike whether an injection point > {code} > @Inject > private JsfMessage<SomeMessageClass>; > {code} > with a producer method > {code} > @Produces @Dependent > JsfMessage createMessage(InjectionPoint ip) > {code} > 5.2 imo only defines the other way around. Having a raw type at the injection point and a parameterized producer method. > We should define how this is intended to work. > Please note that the producer above works in all existing containers so far but not in Weld2-beta1. > Here is the link to the DS issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-295 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-298) @WithAnnotations needs to consider annotations on superclasses

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-298: ------------------------------- Please review https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/159 > @WithAnnotations needs to consider annotations on superclasses > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-298 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-298 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Minor > Labels: with-annotations > Fix For: 1.1.PFD > > > The wording current prohibits this, it's a mistake in the wording. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

11 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev February 2013