March 2017 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-697) Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes

by Laird Nelson (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Laird Nelson commented on CDI-697: ---------------------------------- Oh; that returns even (say) {{private}} fields of all supertypes? > Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-697 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-697 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Portable Extensions > Reporter: Laird Nelson > Priority: Minor > > A lot of duplicate efforts could be eliminated if the CDI SPI supplied delegating implementations of each of the {{Annotated*}} SPI interfaces. These implementations would assist in creating objects suitable for passing to {{ProcessAnnotatedType#setAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType)}} (and the like) when the configurator APIs prove to be too simplistic. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-697) Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes

by John Ament (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] John Ament commented on CDI-697: -------------------------------- you would still use {{pat.configureAnnotatedType().fields()}} (for instance) to get those fields, which will return you back {{AnnotatedFieldConfigurator}} instances. > Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-697 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-697 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Portable Extensions > Reporter: Laird Nelson > Priority: Minor > > A lot of duplicate efforts could be eliminated if the CDI SPI supplied delegating implementations of each of the {{Annotated*}} SPI interfaces. These implementations would assist in creating objects suitable for passing to {{ProcessAnnotatedType#setAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType)}} (and the like) when the configurator APIs prove to be too simplistic. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-697) Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes

by Laird Nelson (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Laird Nelson commented on CDI-697: ---------------------------------- Right; what about manipulating (say) the annotations on fields of superclasses? I assumed the configurators were for simple cases, and the {{setXX}} methods were the "escape hatch". > Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-697 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-697 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Portable Extensions > Reporter: Laird Nelson > Priority: Minor > > A lot of duplicate efforts could be eliminated if the CDI SPI supplied delegating implementations of each of the {{Annotated*}} SPI interfaces. These implementations would assist in creating objects suitable for passing to {{ProcessAnnotatedType#setAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType)}} (and the like) when the configurator APIs prove to be too simplistic. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-697) Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes

by John Ament (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] John Ament commented on CDI-697: -------------------------------- This was the intent of the configurators. Instead of calling setXX you use configureZZ to replace the various methods. While we can't deprecate the set methods, it is encouraged to avoid them. > Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-697 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-697 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Portable Extensions > Reporter: Laird Nelson > Priority: Minor > > A lot of duplicate efforts could be eliminated if the CDI SPI supplied delegating implementations of each of the {{Annotated*}} SPI interfaces. These implementations would assist in creating objects suitable for passing to {{ProcessAnnotatedType#setAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType)}} (and the like) when the configurator APIs prove to be too simplistic. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-697) Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes

by Laird Nelson (JIRA)

Laird Nelson created CDI-697: -------------------------------- Summary: Provide delegating/forwarding implementations of the annotated type model classes Key: CDI-697 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-697 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Portable Extensions Reporter: Laird Nelson Priority: Minor A lot of duplicate efforts could be eliminated if the CDI SPI supplied delegating implementations of each of the {{Annotated*}} SPI interfaces. These implementations would assist in creating objects suitable for passing to {{ProcessAnnotatedType#setAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType)}} (and the like) when the configurator APIs prove to be too simplistic. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

Spam on ML

by Antoine Sabot-Durand

Hi all, You may have notice a spam email sent with my address yesterday. This mail spoofing reaching the ML, led me to reinforce security on the ML. So after your next posting to the ML, please double check on the ML archive [1] that your mail effectively reached everyone. Thanks for your understanding, Antoine [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

wow, this is really awesome

by antoine

Hello! I've just found something really awesome, you just need to see that stuff. Just take a look http://guide.cockfer.com/c2c3 Yours truly, antoine

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-694) Make an observer that uses both @Observes and @ObservesAsync forbidden

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Work on CDI-694 started by Antoine Sabot-Durand. ------------------------------------------------ > Make an observer that uses both @Observes and @ObservesAsync forbidden > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-694 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-694 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John Ament > Assignee: Antoine Sabot-Durand > Fix For: 2.0 .Final > > > Not explicitly called out in the spec text, we should make an observer that has both annotations forbidden. > RI presently throws a DefinitionException. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-692) isResolvable missing from 5.6.1

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Work on CDI-692 started by Antoine Sabot-Durand. ------------------------------------------------ > isResolvable missing from 5.6.1 > ------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-692 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-692 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John Ament > Assignee: Antoine Sabot-Durand > Fix For: 2.0 .Final > > > Section 5.6.1 is missing the new isResolvable method http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/2.0.Beta1/cdi-spec.html#dynamic_lookup -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-689) Typo or unclear message in 24.1.2

by Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Work on CDI-689 started by Antoine Sabot-Durand. ------------------------------------------------ > Typo or unclear message in 24.1.2 > --------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-689 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-689 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: John Ament > Assignee: Antoine Sabot-Durand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.0 .Final > > > Section 24.1.2 includes the following text: > {quote} > When Running in Java EE, the container must extend the rules defined in Observer method invocation context and must also ensure that > All kinds of observers are called in the same client security context as the invocation of Event.fire() or Event.fireAsync() or BeanManager.fireEvent(). > {quote} > The break after "that" in the first line seems weird, its not clear if its supposed to continue into the second line, or if the sentence is intended to continue. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev March 2017