Hmm, especially the @Produces case needs to be clarified, since it may be that there is a
bean-defining annotation at method-level.
And we should address
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-404 too in this context.
Regards,
Arne
Von: Jens Schumann
<jens.schumann@openknowledge.de<mailto:jens.schumann@openknowledge.de>>
Datum: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 13:38
An: Antoine Sabot-Durand
<antoine@sabot-durand.net<mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net>>,
"cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>"
<cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
Betreff: Re: [cdi-dev] Today's meeting Agenda
Hi Antoine!
Here is MY extra wish:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-408.
For the MR I think it would be OK to clarify that both @Producer and @Observes will be
ignored if bean-discovery-mode="annotated" and the producer field/producer
method/observer method is in a bean without a bean defining annotation. Even if I consider
@Dependent @Producer/@Observes a bad practice it did work before and can lead to
unexpected results, especially for observers.
@Arne: Could you please be my voice in today's meeting? ;)
Jens
Von: Antoine Sabot-Durand
<antoine@sabot-durand.net<mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net>>
Datum: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 11:29
An: CDI-Dev <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
Betreff: [cdi-dev] Today's meeting Agenda
Hi all,
I didn’t receive any extra wishes for the MR. So I guess we have a final list here (except
if you bring your issues in live in the last minute).
I propose the following agenda :
1. Discussion on the last ticket pending : CDI-395 Public fields in extensions should not
be allowed [1]
2. Last second ticket if any
3. Starting the MR
Regards,
Antoine
[1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-395