Re: [cdi-dev] async: back to completion future?
Dne 7.3.2016 v 16:15 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
> Am 07.03.2016 um 09:03 schrieb Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>:
>
> You call it "awesome idea", I agree that this feature makes sense, but I
> call it "manipulative approach". It was implemented before the EG was
> able to decide. The same for CDI-527 - OWB has a config property
> "javax.enterprise.inject.allowProxying.classes"
Come on Martin, don’t be unfair. How long has this been discussed? Read the original
ticket and discussions for bean-discovery-mode where I explained it already. That was
almost 4 years ago.
But instead the ‚annotated‘ mode got favoured and as it turned out is not that useful in
real world because it messes up most Extensions.
Can we please do it RIGHT now? What’s the problem?
I'm sorry, I know the issue was created long time ago (05/Feb/14 5:51
PM). Altough it wasn't discussed thorougly - but that's not your fault
of course. Again, I don't say it's a bad idea (I like it actually). I
just don't like the way you're pushing your opinions (e.g. we did not
agreed on the name and bang... OWB acts as if the PR was merged).
LieGrue,
strub