I have no clue where some folks get the idea that I introduced a new concept!
The term ‚proxy‘ is well defined both in the the whole Java universe (see
java.lang.reflect.Proxy) and also got introduced in the CDI spec as early as 2008. That
makes 8 years now… Wanna get rid of all that?
it has poor performance, and
FUD and not true anymore since
ages!
It’s an implementation detail. In OpenWebBeans we do 10 MILLION proxy invocations in 20
milliseconds on my notebook. I don’t call that slow…
LieGrue,
strub
Am 12.02.2016 um 15:41 schrieb José Paumard
<jose.paumard(a)gmail.com>:
-1
For me it looks like setting implementation details in the specification, a really wrong
idea imho.
Plus, what does "proxy" mean ? We need to define the term in the spec. Does it
refer to java.lang.Proxy ? We all know that this class has been written a long time ago,
it has poor performance, and has already submitted replacements based on MethodHandle and
INDY.
José
2016-02-11 12:09 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com>:
+1
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.
--
Java le soir Cours Java en ligne
Twitter Paris JUG
M : +33 6 76 82 91 47
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.