Re: [cdi-dev] Merging JSR-330 into CDI
It's fine to have one spec own multiple packages. But one package shall not get
maintained by multiple specs.
Think about how sealed jars or OSGi should handle this -> technically broken and also
not allowed by the JCP rules.
Thus before we seriously think about that we need to know what features we like to get
from JSR-330.
I mean I'm really happy to have all this enthusiasm, but in the end it needs to turn
into real progress.
There are sooo many pull requests waiting to get reviewed first!
* CDI-SE needs a total rework for example
* the Builders need a review
etc
LieGrue,
strub
On Sunday, 20 March 2016, 11:12, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de> wrote:
3.) We cannot simply take the javax.inject package and maintain it in CDI. It is forbidden
to split a java package into multiple specs.
>
Do you mean it's forbidden for a spec to own multiple packages, e.g. CDI owning both
javax.enterprise and javax.inject, or a single package being owned by multiple specs, e.g.
javax.inject being owned by both AtInject 1.0 and CDI 2/3.x?