Re: [cdi-dev] where is defined javax.enterprise.context.conversation.id?

As far as I know, dots are allowed in ECMAScript, under dot notation. On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 9:17:38 AM Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; wrote: Folks, I fear there is another issue: > > >Are dots in EL names even allowed? I think not. > >Please read up EL-3.0 > >1.6 Operators [] and . >The EL follows ECMAScript in unifying the treatment of the . and [] operators. > >And in ECMAScript dots are afaik _not_ allowed in names! > > >If it works in some implementations then that is fine, but it is not required by the spec -> non portable. We must not require this in CDI! > >Gonna ping the servlet EG to get this confirmed. > > > >LieGrue, >strub > > > >> On Friday, 2 January 2015, 12:50, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; wrote: >> > Forget it, I found it. Maybe I had some typo in my grep... >> >> >> >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >>> On Friday, 2 January 2015, 11:59, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; >> wrote: >>> > I've grepped all the cdi spec project and this string doesn't >> appear. >>> When did this got added? >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Friday, 2 January 2015, 8:15, Tomas Remes <tremes(a)redhat.com&gt; >> >>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've checked the related TCK test and it seems to me valid. In CDI >> spec >>> >>>> there is: >>>> >>>> "6.7.5. The Conversation interface >>>> The container provides a built-in bean with bean type Conversation , >> scope >>>> @RequestScoped , >>>> and qualifier @Default , named javax.enterprise.context.conversation >>> ." >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; >>>> To: "Antonio Goncalves" <antonio.goncalves(a)gmail.com&gt;, >> >>>> "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> Cc: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:57:28 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] where is defined >>>> javax.enterprise.context.conversation.id? >>>> >>>> cid is a different thing. But I did nowhere (spec and api) find the >> one >>>> mentioned by Romain. >>>> So I think it's not specified and we need to exclude this test. >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday, 29 December 2014, 21:41, Antonio Goncalves >>>> <antonio.goncalves(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nothing in JSF nor in Servlet, but in CDI 1.2 Specification : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 6.7.4. Conversation context lifecycle >>>>> (...) >>>>> The long-running conversation associated with a >>>>> request may be propagated to any Servlet request via use of a >> request >>>> parameter named cid >>>>> containing the unique identifier of the conversation. In this >> case, the >>> >>>> application must manage this >>>>> request parameter. >>>>> (...) >>>>> >>>>> This is accomplished via use of a request parameter named cid >>> containing the >>>> unique >>>>> identifier of the conversation. >>>>> (...) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi guys >>>>>> >>>>>> didnt find in CDI and JSF PDFs where is defined >>>>>> "javax.enterprise.context.conversation.id". Seems it >> >>> should be >>>>>> available in ELs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have any pointer please? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> @rmannibucau >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cdi-dev mailing list >>>>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider >> licenses >>> the >>>> code under the Apache License, Version 2 >>>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas >> >>> provided >>>> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual >>> property >>>> rights inherent in such information. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Antonio Goncalves >>>>> Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author >>>>> >>>>> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Pluralsight | Paris JUG | Devoxx >> France >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> cdi-dev mailing list >>>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>>>> >>>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider >> licenses the >>> code >>>> under the Apache License, Version 2 >>>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas >> >>> provided >>>> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual >>> property >>>> rights inherent in such information. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cdi-dev mailing list >>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>>> >>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses >> the >>> code >>>> under the Apache License, Version 2 >>>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas >> >>> provided >>>> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual >>> property >>>> rights inherent in such information. >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code >> under the Apache License, Version 2 >> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided >> on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property >> rights inherent in such information. >> >_______________________________________________ >cdi-dev mailing list &gt;cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > >Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. >