Re: [cdi-dev] TCK and spec question
No you can NOT I fear.
How do you make sure that the AnnotatedType someone added doesn't get changed later?
We have no whatever control over it. If some programmer like to make it mutable, well
then it is that way and we have no chance to detect that :(
Imo the only thing we can do is to point programmers to the fact that this is stupid ->
non-portable behaviour.
LieGrue,
strub
On Monday, 22 December 2014, 9:29, Jozef Hartinger
<jharting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
On 12/21/2014 09:47 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just came across this little sentence in the spec
>
>
>
> 11.5.6 "If any ProcessAnnotatedType method is called outside of the
observer method invocation, an IllegalStateException is thrown."
>
>
> I don't believe such a limitation helps much. What about extensions who
do a setAnnotatedType and change this instance in a later phase?
Such as?
> We have no whatever chance to prevent this anyway.
We can prevent that by throwing the exception, rather than silently
ignoring that the extension is doing something wrong.
>
> So why not just say that if a CDI System Event gets modified outside of the
method it gets injected into then non portable behaviour results.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2
(http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided
on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property
rights inherent in such information.