Re: [cdi-dev] Contexts behavior in SE and Async Event for EDR1

Am 19.06.2015 um 14:57 schrieb Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com&gt;: I agree with Martin and Mark. @RequestScoped already is used as a general purpose task-bound scope. This covers, but is not limited to, HTTP request. On the other hand @SessionScoped and @ConversationScoped are only defined to be available for HTTP requests. On 06/19/2015 08:43 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote: > Jozef, Martin, > > > What is your POV on that ? > > Antoine > > >> Le 18 juin 2015 à 20:37, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; a écrit : >> >> 1.) The whole point is that @RequestScoped is NOT a web context! >> >> Otherwise it would _not_ be active in JMS etc… >> And that was not an accident but intentional. >> >> 2.) And no, different async threads will _never_ get the same request context… >> >> >> 3.) no @RequestScoped is a sub-part of a @ThreadScoped. Otherwise you would get the same context for 2 JMS invocations which get (randomly) executed on the same worker thread. Got me? >> >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >>> Am 18.06.2015 um 15:13 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com&gt;: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I wouldn't activate any "web" scope by default, in particular for async events where I think most of the time it will not be used. Next feature request will be to inherit the scope between async threads....and here I guess we agree it will not go very far. >>> >>> Side note: using request scope where actually a thread scope is needed is a pain, maybe time to add a thread scoped with an accessible manual activation. Would make "batches", "timers" etc easy to impl/integrate. >>> >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber >>> >>> 2015-06-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt;: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> We should finally decide how to manage normal scope context (other than application context ) in SE and during Async Event for EDR1. >>> >>> Having only RequestContext active during async event as Martin suggest in the PR makes sense and would be consistent with its behavior during async EJB call. >>> >>> Mark asked twice to activate Request Context all the time in SE (making it a new Application Context). I’m not found of it, but I’ml not the only one to decide here. >>> >>> What is you feeling about this ? >>> >>> Antoine >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cdi-dev mailing list >>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>> >>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cdi-dev mailing list >>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>> >>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.