[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys...
]
Marius Bogoevici edited comment on CDI-74 at 5/24/11 5:52 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. We should describe the desired behaviour, not implementation. Any other observable
traits besides the 3 that I mentioned?
was (Author: marius.bogoevici):
Yes. We should describe the desired behaviour, not implementation. Any other
observable effects besides the 3 that I mentioned?
State explicitely that Decorators must be implemented using
subclassing
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-74
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-74
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Decorators
Affects Versions: 1.0
Reporter: Marius Bogoevici
Assignee: Marius Bogoevici
Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed)
Subclassing should be mandatory for Decorators of managed beans which are not session
beans (no restrictions in the case of the latter).
This ensures that:
- fields on pseudo scoped managed beans are accessible
- there's no restriction on what kinds of constructors may a managed bean have
- no extra bean instances are created when a managed bean is created
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira