Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 2.0 first Face to face meeting feedbac

On Wednesday, 29 October 2014, 12:04, Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > CDI.current() is the only problematic bit. Otherwise, there is no reason why running multiple CDI containers at the same time should be prohibited. I think we could limit CDI.current() usage in multi-container environments and say that a CDI instance obtained from boot.initialize() should be used instead of using CDI.current(). On 10/24/2014 12:15 PM, Pete Muir wrote: >> On 23 Oct 2014, at 16:11, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; wrote: >> >> I think the only sane thing is to give guarantees for exactly 1 BeanManager at the same time in a JVM. > +1 from me, though we should word it that people can do other things if they want to. > >> Supporting multiple BeanManagers could be done by wiring up an own ClassLoader hierarchy pretty easily. But I have not yet seen any requirement to do so in any productive project so far. >> >> >> And changing impls to support the requirement to support different active BeanManagers on the same Thread is a task for really freaky minds... >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> On Thursday, 23 October 2014, 13:39, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >>> >>> I could see this being problematic for implementations to deal with: >>> >>> >>> ContainerBoot boot = ...; >>> BeanManager beanManager1 = boot.initialize(); >>> CDI.current(); >>> BeanManager beanManager2 = boot.initialize(); >>> CDI.current(); >>> >>> >>> I see the second call to CDI.current() failing, since it should end up bound to a thread. If we instead return back a reference to CDI here, we know which instance we're dealing with and avoid the underlying threading problem. >>> >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; wrote: >>> >>> What would be the interest of having CDI object to call getBeanManager() instead of having the bean manager directly ? >>>> >>>> Antoine >>>> >>>> Le 23 oct. 2014 à 03:13, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com&gt; a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Hi Antoine, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> For the SE feature, I think the return type on the initialize() methods should be CDI instead of BeanManager. What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> New post on the blog : Check what was discussed in our last week F2F meeting. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.cdi-spec.org/news/2014/10/20/CDI-2_0-first-face-to-face-meetin... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Antoine >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cdi-dev mailing list >>>>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. >>>>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cdi-dev mailing list >>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>> >>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.