I agree with Martin and Mark. @RequestScoped already is used as a
general purpose task-bound scope. This covers, but is not limited to,
HTTP request. On the other hand @SessionScoped and @ConversationScoped
are only defined to be available for HTTP requests.
On 06/19/2015 08:43 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
Jozef, Martin,
What is your POV on that ?
Antoine
> Le 18 juin 2015 à 20:37, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de> a écrit :
>
> 1.) The whole point is that @RequestScoped is NOT a web context!
>
> Otherwise it would _not_ be active in JMS etc…
> And that was not an accident but intentional.
>
> 2.) And no, different async threads will _never_ get the same request context…
>
>
> 3.) no @RequestScoped is a sub-part of a @ThreadScoped. Otherwise you would get the
same context for 2 JMS invocations which get (randomly) executed on the same worker
thread. Got me?
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>> Am 18.06.2015 um 15:13 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I wouldn't activate any "web" scope by default, in particular for
async events where I think most of the time it will not be used. Next feature request will
be to inherit the scope between async threads....and here I guess we agree it will not go
very far.
>>
>> Side note: using request scope where actually a thread scope is needed is a pain,
maybe time to add a thread scoped with an accessible manual activation. Would make
"batches", "timers" etc easy to impl/integrate.
>>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
>>
>> 2015-06-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand
<antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> We should finally decide how to manage normal scope context (other than
application context ) in SE and during Async Event for EDR1.
>>
>> Having only RequestContext active during async event as Martin suggest in the PR
makes sense and would be consistent with its behavior during async EJB call.
>>
>> Mark asked twice to activate Request Context all the time in SE (making it a new
Application Context). I’m not found of it, but I’ml not the only one to decide here.
>>
>> What is you feeling about this ?
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For
all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For
all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under
the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all
other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.