[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Tomas Remes edited comment on CDI-667 at 12/19/16 2:12 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
I would suggest to introduce new chapter in 26.2 which will be named "Trimmed bean
archive in Java EE" or something like that. I would state the same rules in this
chapter as in {{17.4. Default bean discovery mode for Java EE}} or maybe we can only
reference this chapter in the sense that same rules for EJBs apply also for trimmed bean
archive.
Hm but thinking further we should probably introduce some new wording for this. E.g not
use only "discovered" but use "are not removed from the set of discovered
types" instead.
was (Author: tremes):
I would suggest to introduce new chapter 26.2 which will be named "Trimmed bean
archive in Java EE" or something like that. I would state the same rules in this
chapter as in {{17.4. Default bean discovery mode for Java EE}} or maybe we can only
reference this chapter in the sense that same rules for EJBs apply also for trimmed bean
archive.
Hm but thinking further we should probably introduce some new wording for this. E.g not
use only "discovered" but use "are not removed from the set of discovered
types" instead.
Session beans in trimmed bean archive
-------------------------------------
Key: CDI-667
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-667
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Reporter: Tomas Remes
Fix For: 2.0 .Final
Currently it is not obvious how session beans should be treated in trimmed bean archive.
In other words are they considered as beans or not?
IMO we should state that there are discovered as beans, but it's questionable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)