Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cdi-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org You can reach the person managing the list at cdi-dev-owner(a)lists.jboss.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..." Today's Topics: 1. [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types discrepancies (Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)) 2. [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types discrepancies (Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)) 3. [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types discrepancies (Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)) 4. EDR1 ready to be released (Antoine Sabot-Durand) 5. Let's Sept 25th -26th for our F2F meeting (Antoine Sabot-Durand) 6. Re: Let's Sept 25th -26th for our F2F meeting (Antonio Goncalves) 7. Re: EDR1 ready to be released (Jozef Hartinger) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:57:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)" <issues(a)jboss.org&gt; Subject: [cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types discrepancies To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Message-ID: <JIRA.12576163.1435157807000.79934.1435157821986(a)Atlassian.JIRA&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand updated CDI-538: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 2.0-EDR1 > Fix parameterized types discrepancies > ------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-538 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Portable Extensions > Affects Versions: 1.2.Final > Reporter: Antoine Sabot-Durand > Fix For: 2.0-EDR1 > > > In the SPI, the spec states the following: > {quote} > * For a producer method with method return type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}. > * For a producer field with field type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}. > {quote} > But the Javadoc and impl behavior is > {quote} > * For a producer method with method return type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}. > * For a producer field with field type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}. > {quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:57:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)" <issues(a)jboss.org&gt; Subject: [cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types discrepancies To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Message-ID: <JIRA.12576163.1435157807000.79933.1435157821962(a)Atlassian.JIRA&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Antoine Sabot-Durand created CDI-538: ---------------------------------------- Summary: Fix parameterized types discrepancies Key: CDI-538 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Bug Components: Portable Extensions Affects Versions: 1.2.Final Reporter: Antoine Sabot-Durand In the SPI, the spec states the following: {quote} * For a producer method with method return type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}. * For a producer field with field type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}. {quote} But the Javadoc and impl behavior is {quote} * For a producer method with method return type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}. * For a producer field with field type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}. {quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:58:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)" <issues(a)jboss.org&gt; Subject: [cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types discrepancies To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Message-ID: <JIRA.12576163.1435157807000.79936.1435157882400(a)Atlassian.JIRA&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand updated CDI-538: ------------------------------------- Reporter: Antonin Stefanutti (was: Antoine Sabot-Durand) > Fix parameterized types discrepancies > ------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-538 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Portable Extensions > Affects Versions: 1.2.Final > Reporter: Antonin Stefanutti > Fix For: 2.0-EDR1 > > > In the SPI, the spec states the following: > {quote} > * For a producer method with method return type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}. > * For a producer field with field type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}. > {quote} > But the Javadoc and impl behavior is > {quote} > * For a producer method with method return type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}. > * For a producer field with field type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}. > {quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:19:40 +0200 From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Subject: [cdi-dev] EDR1 ready to be released To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Message-ID: <0E18098B-212C-4183-9772-560430AFA89E(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi guys, The branch 2.0-EDR1 is ready for release. Beyond the source, you can check javadoc here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/EDR1-Doc/index.html < https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/EDR1-Doc/index.html> And spec here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html < https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html> Or PDF version: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-2.0-EDR1.pdf < https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-2.0-EDR1.pdf> I have still some work on introduction (major changes, etc?) and on copyright in source files and intend to start release process (three the JCP) tomorrow. Antoine -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150625/63b8ab91/at... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150625/63b8ab91/at... ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:16:43 +0200 From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Subject: [cdi-dev] Let's Sept 25th -26th for our F2F meeting To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Message-ID: <4C409AF7-57D7-4B62-A82F-B40EC9C778BC(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all, So the vote closed on modally. We should have talk about the final date in the last meeting, but there was too much on our plate ;). We have a tie between 18th and 25th, but as John can make it for the 25th and he?s probably the farthest one from Paris to come I propose to keep this date. Regards, Antoine -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150625/bf53ea6c/at... ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:27:16 +0200 From: Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves(a)gmail.com&gt; Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Let's Sept 25th -26th for our F2F meeting To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Message-ID: <CA+ZZq9-ck= yyQfethzEzBb3SY-wWBXFxT-RvG_2nFsnqcEmXfQ(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" +1 On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand < antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; wrote: > Hi all, > > So the vote closed on modally. We should have talk about the final date in > the last meeting, but there was too much on our plate ;). > > We have a tie between 18th and 25th, but as John can make it for the 25th > and he?s probably the farthest one from Paris to come I propose to keep > this date. > > Regards, > > Antoine > > > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the > code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other > intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > -- Antonio Goncalves Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn < http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Pluralsight <http://pluralsight.com/training/Authors/Details/antonio-goncalves> | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150625/fc81250c/at... ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:38:36 +0200 From: Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com&gt; Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] EDR1 ready to be released To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt;, cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Message-ID: <5591121C.2090905(a)redhat.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" How do we deal with the lack of parameter-level @Priority in the meantime? On 06/25/2015 11:19 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote: > Hi guys, > > The branch 2.0-EDR1 is ready for release. > > Beyond the source, you can check javadoc here: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/EDR1-Doc/index.html > > And spec here: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html > > Or PDF version: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-2.0-EDR1.pdf > > I have still some work on introduction (major changes, etc?) and on > copyright in source files and intend to start release process (three > the JCP) tomorrow. > > Antoine > > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150629/354fedf6/at... ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 55, Issue 37 ***************************************