]
Martin Kouba commented on CDI-447:
----------------------------------
Well yes, this section could be split into several subsections. Right now it contains five
lists and is not very easy to read.
Section 12.1 specifies that JVM classpath must be included in bean
archive identification
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-447
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-447
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Components: Packaging and Deployment
Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
Reporter: Phil Zampino
Section 12.1 of the spec states:
When determining which archives are bean archives, the container must consider:
• Library jars, EJB jars or application client jars
• The WEB-INF/classes directory of a war
• Directories in the JVM classpath
For CDI 1.0, I think the inclusion of "directories in the JVM classpath" would
not be a big deal. However, since the introduction of implicit bean archives, I'm
wondering if implementations are required to scan the JVM classpath for classes annotated
with bean-defining annotations. This seems like it has the potential to be an expensive
requirement, and it should not be required.