]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on CDI-496:
----------------------------------------
excepted the CDI container doesnt have to know the EJB actual impl type so how can it
validate it? I think it should be done in EJB container - anyway it should be done in EJB
container anyway and lifecycle between EJB and CDI container doesnt say today which one
would fail first
Clarification (or completion) for interceptor binding to session
bean
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-496
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-496
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Components: Interceptors
Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
Reporter: Tomas Remes
Fix For: 2.0 (discussion)
It's not clear if the session bean can have interceptor binding and what rules (if
any) apply to this case. In the beginning of chapter 9. Interceptor bindings there is
following statement:
{quote}Managed beans and EJB session and message-driven beans support
interception.{quote}
But at the end of "9.3. Binding an interceptor to a bean" There is only:
{quote}
If a managed bean has a class-level or method-level interceptor binding, the managed bean
must
be a proxyable bean type, as defined in Section 3.15, “Unproxyable bean types”.
{quote}