[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Matej Novotny edited comment on CDI-743 at 2/15/19 9:42 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------ Actually, I think that {{getCDIProvider()}} method should probably check upon every access that the chosen provider (even the cached one) still returns non-null value from {{getCDI()}}. That, or better still, it should catch ISE from the invocation of {{getCDI()}} because currently it doesn't take into consideration that providers would do that despite the fact that {{getCDI()}} contract clearly states ISE as a valid "return" option. Imagine a situation with multiple CDI providers and you read Weld's one first and since no Weld container runs at the moment, it blows up with ISE. Now what{{CDI}} does is that it stops iterating over all providers and proliferates this exception to you effectively hiding remaining CDI providers that could have worked. was (Author: manovotn): Actually, I think that {{getCDIProvider()}} method should probably check upon every access that the chosen provider (even the cached one) still returns non-null value from {{getCDI()}}. That, or it should catch ISE from the invocation of {{getCDI()}} because currently it doesn't take into consideration that providers would do that. Imagine a situation with multiple CDI providers and you read Weld's one first and since no Weld container runs at the moment, it blows up with ISE. Now what{{CDI}} does is that it stops iterating over all providers and proliferates this exception to you. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)