Yeah, this should be split out into lists. Can you file a CDI issue, I will try to reword without changing the meaning. On 18 Oct 2011, at 08:12, Rick Hightower wrote: > I think the gist of it is as follows: > > Inheritance of Member-level inheritance... > > •Injected fields are inherited > •Initializer methods, non-static observers, @PostConstruct and @PreDestroy are inherited, but can be overridden > •Interceptors are inherited can be overridden > •Producers, consumers are not inherited > > Check out this working from Section 4.2.... > > > "If X is a generic type, and an injection point, producer method, producer field, disposer method or observer method de- clared by X is inherited by Y, and the declared type of the injection point, producer method, producer field, disposed para- meter or event parameter contains type variables declared by X, the type of the injection point, producer method, producer field, disposed parameter or event parameter inherited in Y is the declared type, after substitution of actual type arguments declared by Y or any intermediate class that is a subclass of X and a superclass of Y." > > > > That is not a paragraph... that is one sentence. > > > > Rick Hightower > (415) 968-9037 > Profile > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

That's a dangerous approach, as it means we introduce possible confusion with two pieces of text saying the same thing. I don't think the sentence needs extensive rephrasing, just a new structure to avoid it being quite so unwieldy to read... On 18 Oct 2011, at 14:31, Martin Kouba wrote: > I would not reword it but instead extend the original text with something like Rick's proposal and beginning with "In other words...". > > There may be people who already spent a lot of time trying to understand that sentence and they would be dissapointed that their favorite sentence disappeared and the new text to explore is here :-). > > Also the meaning of the sentence is ok IMO. > > Martin > > Dne 18.10.2011 15:17, Pete Muir napsal(a): >> Yeah, this should be split out into lists. >> >> Can you file a CDI issue, I will try to reword without changing the meaning. >> >> On 18 Oct 2011, at 08:12, Rick Hightower wrote: >> >> >>> I think the gist of it is as follows: >>> >>> Inheritance of Member-level inheritance... >>> >>> •Injected fields are inherited >>> •Initializer methods, non-static observers, @PostConstruct and @PreDestroy are inherited, but can be overridden >>> •Interceptors are inherited can be overridden >>> •Producers, consumers are not inherited >>> >>> Check out this working from Section 4.2.... >>> >>> >>> "If X is a generic type, and an injection point, producer method, producer field, disposer method or observer method de- clared by X is inherited by Y, and the declared type of the injection point, producer method, producer field, disposed para- meter or event parameter contains type variables declared by X, the type of the injection point, producer method, producer field, disposed parameter or event parameter inherited in Y is the declared type, after substitution of actual type arguments declared by Y or any intermediate class that is a subclass of X and a superclass of Y." >>> >>> >>> >>> That is not a paragraph... that is one sentence. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rick Hightower >>> (415) 968-9037 >>> Profile >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cdi-dev mailing list >>> >>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > -- > Martin Kouba > JBoss Quality Assurance Engineer > E-mail: > mkouba(a)redhat.com > > Web: > www.cz.redhat.com > > Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev