[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Matej Novotny commented on CDI-541:
-----------------------------------
I can see what you mean now. Previously I thought that it is just about invocation order
and that the next observer won't be waiting till the previous (with higher priority)
finishes.
While this makes sense I feel it doesn't exactly follow the idea of loose coupling
which goes hand in hand with async handling. Furthermore the 'fire and forget'
approach might suffer from this as you might need to mind existing observers (that is if
you don't intend to leave it default).
Nevertheless, I can definitely see some use cases with the behavior you described. It
certainly may come in handy when we want to allow behavior similar to that of sync
observers but within a separate thread.
Ordering of async observers (vs sync observers) is not specified
----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-541
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-541
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Events
Affects Versions: 2.0-EDR1
Reporter: Tomas Remes
Fix For: 2.0-EDR2
I think this needs to be specified. E.g. what happens if I fire async event and have more
matching sync and async observers? Are all sync observes called first in given order with
no regard to async observers priority?
For example:
{{event.fireAsync(new Message());}}
{code}
public class First {
void observeMessage(@Observes @Priority(2000) Message message){}
}
{code}
{code}
public class Second {
void observeMessage(@ObservesAsync @Priority(2100) Message message){}
}
{code}
{code}
public class Third {
void observeMessage(@Observes @Priority(2200) Message message){}
}
{code}
{code}
public class Fourth {
void observeMessage(@ObservesAsync @Priority(2300) Message message){}
}
{code}
What will be the order in this case? First, Third, Second, Fourth?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)