[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on CDI-527:
----------------------------------------
@Jozef: just use a parent class with a protected final method. This is not forbidden. That
said 3.2 should remove this constraint since that's a regression from 3.1.
last point: why do we care about EJB at all? CDi just allow an integration with EJB but
EJB shouldn't be the first model (in particular because it defines this contract
definition which is not the case in CDI where internal methods are seen as well).
allow proxying of classes with non-private final methods
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-527
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-527
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Beans
Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Fix For: 2.0 (discussion)
Currently we explicitly disallow proxying of classes with non-private final methods.
EJB _does_ allow this. And there are a few final methods in the JDK and other libs. E.g.
HashMap#initHashSeedAsNeeded. Currently we cannot have a producer method for it.
We might rethink our decision and allow it. Probably with an own annotation like
@AllowProxying which disables this check for certain cases (subclass managed-beans or
producers).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)