I see I'm still slightly off, I think I'm about fried for today. Thanks
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
Ah, I thought you also picked up the issue on starting/stopping the
container as well, which is linked to this one.
Maybe we should think about the concept of a Deployment API for forge, and
what that would mean, but for now, let's just try this out on AS7.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker.nl(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> I think we're talking about two different things here
> 1) Deploying to AS7 using Shrinkwrap/Arquillian instead of file copies.
> 2) Downloading and setting up the container (the issue Lincoln linked to).
> But anyway, I agree we should do this. I will pick this up.
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> Does this look like a good starting point? Is this what you were thinking?
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Aslak Knutsen <aslak(a)4fs.no> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
>> <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Yes, we need this. I believe Paul is working on this. Copied forge-dev.
>> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFORGE-284
>> > Where do we get started?
>> > ~Lincoln
>> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com>
>> >> I think its very important to switch forge over to the arquillian
>> >> container module to handle container life cycle and deploy commands in
>> >> generic way, rather than the current as7 command. Could you guys catch
>> up so
>> >> lincoln can get the info he needs about the container apis to get this
>> >> kickef off? This is a great example of using what we have across
>> >> (to follow up on a theme from the f2f).
>> >> - Dan Allen
>> >> Sent from my Android-powered phone:
>> >> An open platform for carriers, consumers and developers
>> > --
>> > Lincoln Baxter, III
>> > http://ocpsoft.com
>> > http://scrumshark.com
>> > "Keep it Simple"
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> "Keep it Simple"
Lincoln Baxter, III
"Keep it Simple"