Hi Ivan,
I'd expect it to generate a Maven project with a basic implementation of
the org.jboss.forge.addon.scaffold.spi.ScaffoldProvider interface and
also depending on the templates addon (with some basic templates
available - perhaps JSF) . The idea is to that this generated addon
project could be installed and used without modifications.
On 10-02-2014 10:08, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote:
Hi George,
What would you expect for this project type to generate besides the
packaging type and maybe a couple of dependencies? Is this something
like project-new-project+scaffold-setup?
BTW, not sure whether this is the right thread for the question:
scaffold setup command is not available to my project, even though my
~/.forge/addons directory contains all the necessary scaffold jars.
Cheers,
Ivan
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Vineet Reynolds Pereira
<vpereira(a)redhat.com <mailto:vpereira@redhat.com>> wrote:
Yeah, it might make sense. A bit too early to say if we need a
scaffold project type in the New Project wizard.
We might support creation of new scaffold providers (like
Aerogear) that extend existing scaffold providers (AngularJS),
and I'm not sure if this can be supported via the wizard. Maybe it
is better to revisit this once we've stabilized the programming
model for scaffold providers sufficiently, to limit rewriting this
wizard.
Vineet
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sebastien Blanc" <sblanc(a)redhat.com
<mailto:sblanc@redhat.com>>
> To: forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:05:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [forge-dev] New Scaffolds
>
> On 02/10/2014 03:12 AM, George Gastaldi wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I noticed an increasing demand in the scaffold usage (custom
architectures,
> > technologies,etc). I was thinking that it would be nice if we
had a
> > "Scaffold Project" type (similar to a maven archetype)
allowing the
> > creation of an addon project with available extension points
to the
> > scaffold addon.
> > What do you guys think about it?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > George
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> +1 Sounds good
> We had some interesting discussions around this with Vineet
last week
> during JUDCon
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev