Re: [forge-dev] Forge'in ahead with JBoss Tools

On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >> One thing I was planning on discussing with Lincoln and the Forge roadmap is around the idea of "Forge as a 4GL" - at the moment it feels mostly like a static code generator - which has the problem of schema changes. But Forge as a 4GL could be more responsive, almost "runtime" code generation. More like what you get in the Rails world. :-) > > This is exactly where I hope Forge will *not* go. Yep. I like Forge a lot for getting up and going. It's quite good at that and there's a clear need for it. IMHO, Forge as a 4GL would be really tough to pull off and would take users' attention off of what Forge is best at. _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev