On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 14:14, Max Rydahl Andersen
On Sep 20, 2011, at 05:18, Dan Allen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 16:23, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker.nl(a)gmail.com>
> I think we're talking about two different things here
> 1) Deploying to AS7 using Shrinkwrap/Arquillian instead of file copies.
> This got me thinking, perhaps the Arquillian managed container should
support both a remote deployment and a local deployment. The remote
deployment is via the deployment APIs of a running server, whereas the local
deployment is a file copy to a deployment directory. I'm hesitant to
introduce another type of container in Arquillian, so perhaps it's just an
aspect of a managed container...seems to fit best.
File copies definitely shouldn't go away since otherwise you are dependent
on both the server running and the server being accessible to you for remote
Not something that is guaranteed in todays world - i.e. openshift servers
or production servers aren't necessarily accessible for remote operations
beyond file copies.
Right, which is why I think the Arquillian container adapters should support
this deployment method, even if they aren't use for Arquillian tests. Aslak
and ALR, got an opinion on where this feature should fit into the existing
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597