Yes, that could happen in a major release change. In the meanwhile, they are happy living
together in the parser-java addon :)
Em 30/03/2014, às 12:55, Antonio Goncalves
<antonio.mailing(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
Ok. When will java-parser be officially replaced by Roaster ? Forge 3 ?
2014-03-29 19:07 GMT+01:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com>:
> On second thought, I think this is not a good idea. You should depend on the
parser-java addon and that is already in the BOM.
>
> Em 29/03/2014, às 15:00, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com> escreveu:
>
>> Yes, that would be a good idea. Want to submit a pull-request?
>>
>>> Em 29/03/2014, às 14:27, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was writing some samples with Roaster and I was wondering if it would make
sense to have the Roaster artifacts defined in the Forge BOM ? As a developer it would
make my life easier, but then I don't know if you want to tie Forge and Roaster now.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Antonio Goncalves
>>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>>
>>> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion
Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev