This will probably not make it until 2.x, though, unless we get some more
help :(
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)redhat.com
wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 16:37, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>
> > I have a few "JBoss Style" responses that come to mind ;)
>
> …such as "one of the requirements of seam forge was that it should be
> better than seam-gen" ? :)
>
> > but I really am not sure how we can do that without this feature right
> now. You might do things like group options by type. Strings with Strings,
> etc. You probably would also want to prioritize custom @Option types higher,
> since those are usually more relevant to the command at hand.
>
> don't think those are any better than just showing all.
>
> challenge is that many plugins asks additional questions which we can't
> know about.
>
> > We really need this feature.
>
> Yes Please :)
>
> /max
>
> > ~Lincoln
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen <
> max.andersen(a)redhat.com
wrote:
> > Any recommendations
on how we avoid just showing a dull long list in the
> IDE when no grouping possible ?
> >
> > /max
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > > From: "Lincoln Baxter III (JIRA)"
<jira-events(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > > Subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (SEAMFORGE-211) Support structured
> options in @Commands
> > > Date: September 28, 2011 21:04:26 GMT+02:00
> > > To: max.andersen(a)redhat.com
> > >
> > >
> > > [
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFORGE-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu...]
> > >
> > > Lincoln Baxter III updated SEAMFORGE-211:
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Fix Version/s: Future
> > >
> > >
> > >> Support structured options in @Commands
> > >> ---------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> Key: SEAMFORGE-211
> > >> URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFORGE-211
> > >> Project: Seam Forge
> > >> Issue Type: Feature Request
> > >> Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
> > >> Fix For: Future
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ver considered allowing something like
> > >> generateEntities(@Option String table, @Option String catalog, @Option
> @Option String schema, @NestedOption final JPADataSource datasource)
> > >> class DataSource {
> > >> public DataSource(@Option(...) String name, @Option(..) password,
> @Option(..) ..)
> > >> ...
> > >> )
> > >> Which would actually provide some more nested structure and be useful
> in ui construction in IDE plus better naming of things even in shell ?
> > >> Would also be good to be able to reference "default"
@JPADatasource
> should be "production", "dev" or "test" if
SEAMFORGE-210 comes to life?
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > > For more information on JIRA, see:
>
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> > >
> > >
> >
> > /max
> >
http://about.me/maxandersen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Lincoln Baxter, III
> >
http://ocpsoft.com
> >
http://scrumshark.com
> > "Keep it Simple"
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
> /max
>
http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"