On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is there an issue report? If so, we can shop it around the
twitter-sphere.
Sounds like a good opportunity for a newcomer to tackle, as ALR likes to
emphasize.
-Dan
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 20:23, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, definitely come to the conclusion that this needs to be supported;
> however, it will have to wait until after JBW unless someone else wants to
> take a stab :)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 13:23, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 18:24, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>>> lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As far as classifiers. I've been intentionally avoiding them because
it
>>>> adds a lot of complexity to the dependency API. What do you need?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Regardless of whether you like classifiers in general, you can't ignore
>>> the fact that they are part of a dependency. You really need to support them
>>> or else the forge dep support is just incomplete.
>>>
>>
>> I agree that they are bad for distinguishing between two artifacts (like
>> in the case of testng). The main intention for them is to
>> reference complementary jars, like -source, -javadoc, etc. Of course, you
>> don't need to add those as dependencies.
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>
>>
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
>>
http://mojavelinux.com
>>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
>
http://ocpsoft.com
>
http://scrumshark.com
> "Keep it Simple"
>
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction