Re: [Hawkular-dev] BTM or not BTM, that is the question

Was looking at the wikipedia page for APM: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_performance_management Their definition (conceptual framework) includes user defined 'business transactions' as well, which fits with the project - so possibly Hawkular APM. Although if inclusion of 'performance' maybe indicates too much of an IT tool, rather than a tool for IT and Business, then possibly Hawkular App Manager? ----- Original Message ----- > Extracting some ideas from MiQ. > > They uses the term "Performace" as a wider concept that is focus in the > health of the system. > > So how it sounds > > - Hawkular App Performance > - Hawkular Business Performance ? > > > > ----- Mensaje original ----- > > De: "Thomas Heute" <theute(a)redhat.com&gt; > > Para: "Discussions around Hawkular development" > > <hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > Enviados: Viernes, 27 de Mayo 2016 11:11:19 > > Asunto: Re: [Hawkular-dev] BTM or not BTM, that is the question > > > > I would favor a renaming to "Hawkular <Something>" if we had an idea for a > > name that encapsulate the 3 notions... (I don't). I agree that BTM is > > confusing now. > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Gary Brown < gbrown(a)redhat.com > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all > > > > As discussed in the recent blog (and demo), Hawkular BTM now provides > > Application Performance Management (APM), Distributed Tracing (DT) and > > Business Transaction Management (BTM). > > > > The project was initially started to address the third area, hence being > > called BTM - however BTM requires the collection of the information used to > > provide APM and DT - and providing those other views on the information is > > useful to users. > > > > Due to the wider scope, just wondering whether the BTM name is now > > misleading. If a project component rename was considered a good idea, then > > now would probably be the best time to do it, before getting close to a > > stable 1.0 version? > > > > So two questions: > > > > 1) Is a component rename a good idea? > > > > 2) If so, any suggestions for a name, either some generic term that > > encapsulates APM, DT and BTM - or alternatively a completely unrelated name > > (but then it would not follow the pattern used by other Hawkular > > components). > > > > > > Regards > > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > > hawkular-dev mailing list > > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > hawkular-dev mailing list > > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev