Re: [Hawkular-dev] What are your Authentication and Authorization needs?

> On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn(a)redhat.com > <mailto:jshaughn@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > Juca, I think Lucas is correct, Alerts has the multi-tenancy model > built in and so requires a tenantId on everything. We already have > a standalone distribution (for use outside of Hawkular) that drives > off of the Hawkular-Tenant header, so I guess we would just continue > to use that mechanism in all cases. I guess that means we may drop > the h-accounts dependency but I will discuss further with Lucas and > we'll continue to monitor the accounts changes. > > Lucas, this may further drive the need for schema refactoring because > if we only receive a single tenant on everything coming from MIQ, we > will get very little data distribution. I’ve said it in the past and it’s worth mentioning again. Even with multiple tenants, you should be partitioning by more than just tenant. _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev