Re: [jbosstools-dev] RFE: JDT module or put in common ?

I'd say regardless of the feature/plugin namespace you select (eg., o.j.t.jdt, as Denis +1'd), I can't see any compelling reason to create a new module for this. Therefore, let's put it in the common module. So say we all?

N > > /max > >> >> N >> >> On 07/21/2011 07:56 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> >>>> Unfortunately, I don't see any other practical solution. >>>> +1 for a new JDT module >>>> I would add plugins / features for JBIDE-8972 under the >>>> org.jboss.tools.jdt.classpath namespace >>> >>> I would suggest org.jboss.tools.jdt.core/ui as the plugin name and then if necessary package names under that. >>> >>> Snjezana's could fit in there too or if necessary org.jboss.tools.jdt.debug.core/ui. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> my 0.02�. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Fred Bricon >>>> >>>> On 21/07/2011 10:47, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Snjezana have been working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8548 (easy Attach to Remote debugger) >>>>> and Fred is about to work on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8972 (copy classpath library to project) >>>>> which both are things that actually should exist/be contributed to Eclipse JDT at some point. >>>>> >>>>> The question is where do we put them today ? >>>>> >>>>> Looking at existing modules putting it in common under a new plugin named org.jboss.tools.common.jdt.* is probably the best fit, >>>>> but since common is also much more than that its not the best - its actually mostly related to xmodel than anything else - and >>>>> I could see the interest in installing these JDT features without having to require all of xmodel and its editors extensions installed. >>>>> >>>>> The alternative I see is creating a new module (sigh) named jdt with org.jboss.tools.jdt.* as its base and >>>>> we create a matching feature named "JBoss Tools JDT - Extensions for Eclipse JDT" >>>>> >>>>> I'm leaning to the JDT module approach, but since i'm really not a fan of adding more and more modules without >>>>> a good reason I would like to hear if anyone has convincing arguments for or against this move ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> /max >>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> -- >> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio >> http://nick.divbyzero.com >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > > -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com