On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:12:47AM -0400, Nick Boldt wrote:
Because Alpha2 was an interim state: Kepler M5 w/ newer Jetty 8 (plus
Atlassian 3.0.7, SWTBot 2.0.5).
but as Micakel mention, alpha2-snapshot is where interim state is fine
and its not published anywhere so why not just add what you call alpha3
into this ?
/max
Alpha3 is incompatible w/ Alpha2 as it includes Kepler M6, Atlassian
3.2, and SWTBot 2.1.
N
On 03/23/2013 09:01 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
>On 03/23/2013 11:37 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:31:07AM +0100, Mickael Istria wrote:
>>>On 03/23/2013 05:41 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>Alpha2 (M5 + Jetty 8) and Alpha3 (Kepler M6 + Atlassian, etc.) won't
be
>>>>linked from there until were release JBT 4.1.0.Alpha2
>>>Why would we need an Alpha3, and why would we release an Alpha2 ?
>>
>>I assume you mean why would we not just release an Alpha2 so the
>>latest TP are available to use for next JBT release which coincidently
>>is named Alpha2 too ?
>Yes, that's what I mean.
>I mainly mean: why do we already have an Alpha3 whereas we still are
>doing snapshots of Alpha2. All TP changes until we release a new
>milestone of JBT should be in the current snapshot (TP
>4.30.5.Alpha2-SNAPSHOT).
>
>--
>Mickael Istria
>Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <
http://www.jboss.org/tools>
>My blog <
http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
><http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com