Re: [jbosstools-commits] JBoss Tools SVN: r8244 - in branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core: META-INF and 1 other directory.
4:52 p.m.
Max:
I just found this commit today (I don't browse commit logs much)...
Is it better to depend on a new plugin or to copy the class in question
to a .xpl package?
I personally would have coppied the class. Snjeza decided to add a
dependency.
Thoughts? I personally find it very silly that the AS adapter would
depend on the tomcat adapter.
jbosstools-commits(a)lists.jboss.org wrote:
Author: snjeza
Date: 2008-05-20 17:21:12 -0400 (Tue, 20 May 2008)
New Revision: 8244
Modified:
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
Log:
JBIDE-2215 Unable to add User Library as Source Lookup Path to AS/EAP server
Modified:
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
===================================================================
---
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF 2008-05-20
21:09:49 UTC (rev 8243)
+++
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF 2008-05-20
21:21:12 UTC (rev 8244)
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
org.eclipse.jst.common.project.facet.core,
org.eclipse.wst.xml.core,
org.jboss.ide.eclipse.archives.core,
- org.apache.ant
+ org.apache.ant,
+ org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core
Eclipse-LazyStart: true
Export-Package: org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core,
org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.extensions.archives,
Modified: branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
===================================================================
---
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml 2008-05-20
21:09:49 UTC (rev 8243)
+++
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml 2008-05-20
21:21:12 UTC (rev 8244)
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
name="JBoss Application Server Startup Configuration"
public="true"
sourceLocatorId="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.sourceLocator.JavaSourceLookupDirector"
-
sourcePathComputerId="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.serverSourcePathComputer"/>
+
sourcePathComputerId="org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.sourcePathComputer"/>
<launchConfigurationType
delegate="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.internal.launch.DeployableLaunchConfiguration"
id="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.stripped.launchConfiguration"
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
name="Stripped Server Launch Configuration"
public="false"
sourceLocatorId="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.sourceLocator.JavaSourceLookupDirector"
-
sourcePathComputerId="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.serverSourcePathComputer"/>
+
sourcePathComputerId="org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.sourcePathComputer"/>
<launchConfigurationType
delegate="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.internal.launch.TwiddleLaunchConfiguration"
id="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.twiddleConfiguration"
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-commits mailing list
jbosstools-commits(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-commits
5:46 p.m.
New subject: [jbosstools-commits] JBoss Tools SVN: r8244 - in branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core: META-INF and 1 other directory.
Max:
I just found this commit today (I don't browse commit logs much)...
you just take all updates that comes in too ? :)
Anyhow - it was the minimal fix for GA so ok by me for now.
The code we depend on has zero to do with tomcat.
But yes, going forward isolating it into our project will probably make more sense.
/max
Is it better to depend on a new plugin or to copy the class in
question
to a .xpl package?
I personally would have coppied the class. Snjeza decided to add a
dependency.
Thoughts? I personally find it very silly that the AS adapter would
depend on the tomcat adapter.
jbosstools-commits(a)lists.jboss.org wrote:
> Author: snjeza
> Date: 2008-05-20 17:21:12 -0400 (Tue, 20 May 2008)
> New Revision: 8244
>
> Modified:
>
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
> Log:
> JBIDE-2215 Unable to add User Library as Source Lookup Path to AS/EAP server
>
> Modified:
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> ===================================================================
> ---
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF 2008-05-20
21:09:49 UTC (rev 8243)
> +++
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF 2008-05-20
21:21:12 UTC (rev 8244)
> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
> org.eclipse.jst.common.project.facet.core,
> org.eclipse.wst.xml.core,
> org.jboss.ide.eclipse.archives.core,
> - org.apache.ant
> + org.apache.ant,
> + org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core
> Eclipse-LazyStart: true
> Export-Package: org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core,
> org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.extensions.archives,
>
> Modified:
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
> ===================================================================
> ---
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml 2008-05-20
21:09:49 UTC (rev 8243)
> +++
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml 2008-05-20
21:21:12 UTC (rev 8244)
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
> name="JBoss Application Server Startup Configuration"
> public="true"
>
sourceLocatorId="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.sourceLocator.JavaSourceLookupDirector"
> -
sourcePathComputerId="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.serverSourcePathComputer"/>
> +
sourcePathComputerId="org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.sourcePathComputer"/>
> <launchConfigurationType
>
delegate="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.internal.launch.DeployableLaunchConfiguration"
>
id="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.stripped.launchConfiguration"
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
> name="Stripped Server Launch Configuration"
> public="false"
>
sourceLocatorId="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.sourceLocator.JavaSourceLookupDirector"
> -
sourcePathComputerId="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.serverSourcePathComputer"/>
> +
sourcePathComputerId="org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.sourcePathComputer"/>
> <launchConfigurationType
>
delegate="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.internal.launch.TwiddleLaunchConfiguration"
>
id="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.twiddleConfiguration"
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-commits mailing list
> jbosstools-commits(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-commits
>
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-commits mailing list
jbosstools-commits(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-commits
5:55 p.m.
New subject: [jbosstools-commits] JBoss Tools SVN: r8244 - in branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core: META-INF and 1 other directory.
There are three reasons why I decided to add a dependency:
- we would have to copy at least 5 classes
(TomcatSourcePathComputerDelegate, IModuleVisitor, ModuleTraverser,
TomcatPlugin, org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.internal.Trace ...)
- I have entered bug
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=233110 against wtp. When
they fix this bug, we will revert changes (3 lines)
- I don't like to have the same code in multiple places
I don't see any problem with adding a new dependency because JBoss Tools
already depends on wtp that includes the Tomcat adapter.
I have seen that the ServerSourcePathComputerDelegate class is a
duplicate of GenericServerSourcePathComputerDelegate, but have thought
that the reason for that was removing the
org.eclipse.jst.server.generic.jboss from JBDS what makes sense for me.
Snjeza
Rob Stryker wrote:
Max:
I just found this commit today (I don't browse commit logs much)...
Is it better to depend on a new plugin or to copy the class in
question to a .xpl package?
I personally would have coppied the class. Snjeza decided to add a
dependency.
Thoughts? I personally find it very silly that the AS adapter would
depend on the tomcat adapter.
jbosstools-commits(a)lists.jboss.org wrote:
> Author: snjeza
> Date: 2008-05-20 17:21:12 -0400 (Tue, 20 May 2008)
> New Revision: 8244
>
> Modified:
>
>
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
>
> branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
>
> Log:
> JBIDE-2215 Unable to add User Library as Source Lookup Path to AS/EAP
> server
>
> Modified:
>
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
> ===================================================================
> ---
>
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> 2008-05-20 21:09:49 UTC (rev 8243)
> +++
>
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> 2008-05-20 21:21:12 UTC (rev 8244)
> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
> org.eclipse.jst.common.project.facet.core,
> org.eclipse.wst.xml.core,
> org.jboss.ide.eclipse.archives.core,
> - org.apache.ant
> + org.apache.ant,
> + org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core
> Eclipse-LazyStart: true
> Export-Package: org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core,
> org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.extensions.archives,
>
> Modified:
> branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
>
> ===================================================================
> ---
> branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
> 2008-05-20 21:09:49 UTC (rev 8243)
> +++
> branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
> 2008-05-20 21:21:12 UTC (rev 8244)
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
> name="JBoss Application Server Startup Configuration"
> public="true"
>
>
sourceLocatorId="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.sourceLocator.JavaSourceLookupDirector"
>
> -
>
sourcePathComputerId="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.serverSourcePathComputer"/>
>
> +
>
sourcePathComputerId="org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.sourcePathComputer"/>
>
> <launchConfigurationType
>
>
delegate="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.internal.launch.DeployableLaunchConfiguration"
>
>
> id="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.stripped.launchConfiguration"
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
> name="Stripped Server Launch Configuration"
> public="false"
>
>
sourceLocatorId="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.sourceLocator.JavaSourceLookupDirector"
>
> -
>
sourcePathComputerId="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.serverSourcePathComputer"/>
>
> +
>
sourcePathComputerId="org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.sourcePathComputer"/>
>
> <launchConfigurationType
>
>
delegate="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.internal.launch.TwiddleLaunchConfiguration"
>
>
> id="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.twiddleConfiguration"
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-commits mailing list
> jbosstools-commits(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-commits
>
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
9:55 p.m.
New subject: [jbosstools-commits] JBoss Tools SVN: r8244 - in branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core: META-INF and 1 other directory.
Snjezana:
Thanks for your input. There certainly was no way we'd copy all 5 of
their classes (including TomcatPlugin! ha!), so for GA it was the right
move to make.
I tend to agree with Max, though, in regards to isolating the
functionality and limiting dependencies. I hate adding dependencies and
I hate I have so many as it is ;) I wish I could get my dependency list
down to next to nothing!
Anyway, thanks for the patch in the first place. I didn't mean to jump
on you like that and certainly not to discourage you from patching my
code when needbe.
Thanks so much for the help =]
Snjezana Peco wrote:
There are three reasons why I decided to add a dependency:
- we would have to copy at least 5 classes
(TomcatSourcePathComputerDelegate, IModuleVisitor, ModuleTraverser,
TomcatPlugin, org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.internal.Trace ...)
- I have entered bug
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=233110 against wtp. When
they fix this bug, we will revert changes (3 lines)
- I don't like to have the same code in multiple places
I don't see any problem with adding a new dependency because JBoss
Tools already depends on wtp that includes the Tomcat adapter.
I have seen that the ServerSourcePathComputerDelegate class is a
duplicate of GenericServerSourcePathComputerDelegate, but have thought
that the reason for that was removing the
org.eclipse.jst.server.generic.jboss from JBDS what makes sense for me.
Snjeza
Rob Stryker wrote:
> Max:
>
> I just found this commit today (I don't browse commit logs much)...
> Is it better to depend on a new plugin or to copy the class in
> question to a .xpl package?
> I personally would have coppied the class. Snjeza decided to add a
> dependency.
>
> Thoughts? I personally find it very silly that the AS adapter would
> depend on the tomcat adapter.
>
> jbosstools-commits(a)lists.jboss.org wrote:
>> Author: snjeza
>> Date: 2008-05-20 17:21:12 -0400 (Tue, 20 May 2008)
>> New Revision: 8244
>>
>> Modified:
>>
>>
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>>
>>
>> branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
>>
>> Log:
>> JBIDE-2215 Unable to add User Library as Source Lookup Path to
>> AS/EAP server
>>
>> Modified:
>>
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>>
>> ===================================================================
>> ---
>>
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>> 2008-05-20 21:09:49 UTC (rev 8243)
>> +++
>>
branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>> 2008-05-20 21:21:12 UTC (rev 8244)
>> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
>> org.eclipse.jst.common.project.facet.core,
>> org.eclipse.wst.xml.core,
>> org.jboss.ide.eclipse.archives.core,
>> - org.apache.ant
>> + org.apache.ant,
>> + org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core
>> Eclipse-LazyStart: true
>> Export-Package: org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core,
>> org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.extensions.archives,
>>
>> Modified:
>> branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
>>
>> ===================================================================
>> ---
>> branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
>> 2008-05-20 21:09:49 UTC (rev 8243)
>> +++
>> branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core/plugin.xml
>> 2008-05-20 21:21:12 UTC (rev 8244)
>> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
>> name="JBoss Application Server Startup Configuration"
>> public="true"
>>
>>
sourceLocatorId="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.sourceLocator.JavaSourceLookupDirector"
>>
>> -
>>
sourcePathComputerId="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.serverSourcePathComputer"/>
>>
>> +
>>
sourcePathComputerId="org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.sourcePathComputer"/>
>>
>> <launchConfigurationType
>>
>>
delegate="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.internal.launch.DeployableLaunchConfiguration"
>>
>>
>> id="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.stripped.launchConfiguration"
>> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
>> name="Stripped Server Launch Configuration"
>> public="false"
>>
>>
sourceLocatorId="org.eclipse.jdt.launching.sourceLocator.JavaSourceLookupDirector"
>>
>> -
>>
sourcePathComputerId="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.serverSourcePathComputer"/>
>>
>> +
>>
sourcePathComputerId="org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.sourcePathComputer"/>
>>
>> <launchConfigurationType
>>
>>
delegate="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.internal.launch.TwiddleLaunchConfiguration"
>>
>>
>> id="org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core.server.twiddleConfiguration"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-commits mailing list
>> jbosstools-commits(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-commits
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
8:32 p.m.
New subject: [jbosstools-commits] JBoss Tools SVN: r8244 - in branches/jbosstools-2.1.x/as/plugins/org.jboss.ide.eclipse.as.core: META-INF and 1 other directory.
There are three reasons why I decided to add a dependency:
- we would have to copy at least 5 classes
(TomcatSourcePathComputerDelegate, IModuleVisitor, ModuleTraverser,
TomcatPlugin, org.eclipse.jst.server.tomcat.core.internal.Trace ...)
yup - you definitly took the right decision. Did not expect that many dependencies for a
simple sourcepath lookup ;)
- I have entered bug
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=233110 against wtp. When
they fix this bug, we will revert changes (3 lines)
Yup - this looks like a big bug in the WTP generic server implementation.
/max
6025
days inactive
6029
days old
jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Max Rydahl Andersen -
Rob Stryker -
Snjezana Peco