waaay to many jars in junittests
by Max Rydahl Andersen
Hi guys,
Why are we adding *tons* of duplicated jars and complete JSF/Seam projects just to unittests a few pages with templates?!
I can't beleive all of those files are really necessary to check if a myfaces template page will render correctly.
Could we please make sure our tests just include what is needed and not add tons of unused things. Thanks!
/max
17 years, 1 month
Re: [jbosstools-dev] Support of ADF components in VPE survey
by Sergey Vasilyev
Pete Muir wrote:
> Assuming we are really talking about Trinidad, not ADF (ADF is the non
> opensource varient).
>
> Coexist with Seam (very) well.
>
> Coexist with RichFaces ok (there is an integration package). Alex can
> comment better.
>
> No extra issues when you use Seam+RF+Trinidad. You can see the
> seamdiscs example for it in operation.
>
> On 21 Jan 2008, at 16:51, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:50:27 +0100, Pete …
[View More]Muir <pete.muir(a)jboss.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Technically good, visually appalling.
>>
>> any known issues/recommendations in context of Seam/richfaces ? Do
>> they coexist well/bad?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>>
>>> On 21 Jan 2008, at 16:40, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do we have any coverage of it today ?
>>>>
>>>> I've cc'ed Pete and Gavin to hear about their experience/feedback
>>>> on ADF.
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to ask all of you about supporting ADF Faces Components
>>>>> (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/adf/adffaces/
>>>>> index.html) in
>>>>> our Visual Page Editor. Set of ADF components consists of over 100
>>>>> components. Does the support of ADF components still relevant for us?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sergey
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>
Unfortunately we are supporting the ADF Faces Components (old versions
from uri="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/EA10" till
uri="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/EA13").right now. It is a legacy
from Exadel Studio. And I'm speaking about supporting of ADF (not
opensource) and Trinidad (http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad).
Sergey
[View Less]
17 years, 2 months
Compilation errors in WTP3 / Eclipse 3.4 aka Ganymede compatibility
by Marshall Culpepper
Hey everyone..
I just imported our codebase into Eclipse 3.4 milestone 4 w/ WTP 3.0 M4
to take a look at our compatibility. Currently we have a number of
compilation problems, most of them seem to be internal API
dependencies.. but I didn't go over every single one.For reference, I
downloaded all the Eclipse 3.4/WTP 3.0 stuff from the following URL:
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.0/S-3.0M4-2008010...
To summarize the errors, it looks they are pretty much all …
[View More]over the
board. I'm seeing deprecated and changed internal APIs being used in all
of our components from Hibernate Tools, JBossAS Tools, VPE, Common, to
even the older JBossIDE core.
*Most* of the errors I'm seeing look to be relatively trivial to fix,
but again I haven't gone over every single one. Usually it's a change of
a method / class name, or a field that isn't visible anymore. Also keep
in mind that getting stuff compiling doesn't mean it actually works, so
there might be some bad methods / workarounds we used in old code that
won't work with new libraries.
As Max said today, I think it would be prudent if we branched now so we
can make sure that we have enough time to file bugs and get everything
working before the WTP3.0 / Ganymede freeze date which is coming up in a
few months.
[View Less]
17 years, 2 months