On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:09:40 +0100, Rob Stryker <rob.stryker(a)jboss.com>
wrote:
Because I was told much earlier that two views is crap, one is ideal.
Users
dont want tons of views opened to do somethign that was previously
controlled by a launch configuration.
the two views argument i understand...so why not just have one tree ?
I don't understand your launch configuration point is for ? We still
have that...
/max
On 11/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)jboss.com> wrote:
>
> >> #1
> >> Eclipse WTP has this notion of "Adding an applicaiton" to a
server.
> Does
> >> this also automatically
> >> add source lookup to that server ?
> >
> >
> > AFAIK no.. but this is something that might be possible to code in
> > ourselves
> > for our adapter (Rob would know for sure)
>
> If not, how do they handle the "disable breakpoints" on server feature
> if
> they don't somehow get info about the source ?
> (look in the wtp server preferences)
>
> > #2
> >> We have this splitted jbosserver view with what looks to me a
> filtered
> >> WTP
> >> server view and specific jboss bottm part, correct ?
> >> Why is there both a mix of jboss inc servers and jboss wtp servers
> >> visible
> >> in that one ?
> >
> >
> > Well IMO this should be JBoss servers only as it is the "JBoss Server
> > View"
> > ..
>
> Why not just reuse the existing WTP view and have the jboss specific
> things in another view ?
> (just curious)
>
> --
> --
> Max Rydahl Andersen
> callto://max.rydahl.andersen
>
> Hibernate
> max(a)hibernate.org
>
http://hibernate.org
>
> JBoss a division of Red Hat
> max.andersen(a)jboss.com
> _______________________________________________
> jbosside-dev mailing list
> jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosside-dev
>
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
max(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
JBoss a division of Red Hat
max.andersen(a)jboss.com