Even better would be if people would say "I fixed something in Base
which will impact the downstream build of Openshift, so please ensure
they're built in the correct order."
Or better still, "I reverted that commit in Base and then kicked the
job, waited 10 mins, and kicked an Openshift build too."
What test would have caught this? Some sort of timestamp sequencing
algorithm? Why can't we just communicate changes verbally instead of
just assuming "build magic will happen" ?
On 07/24/2015 04:35 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
JBIDE-20311 was not fixed.
openshift was built before foundation thus it was not picking up the
reverted api change.
Details in jira - it was a "fun" one to figure out. Thanks mlabuda :)
Nick - possible to do a respin and reaggregate ?
mini-retrospective:
if we actually ran tests on the aggregated build AND the tests tested
the fix we made we would have caught this.
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com