[jbosstools-dev] Re: UPDATE: Assistance in testing JBDS with SOA-P

John, I would like to go through this if possible. Run As -> run on server starts the server, but does not create an esb archive or copy it to the server/default/deploy directory.

Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Graham"<jgraham(a)redhat.com> To: "Max Rydahl Andersen"<max.andersen(a)redhat.com> Cc: "Burr Sutter"<bsutter(a)redhat.com>, "Jeffrey Delong"<jdelong(a)redhat.com>, jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org, "Mark Little"<mlittle(a)redhat.com>, "Mark Proctor"<mproctor(a)redhat.com>, "Kris Verlaenen"<kverlaen(a)redhat.com>, "Koen Aers"<kaers(a)redhat.com>, "Leonard Dimaggio"<ldimaggi(a)redhat.com>, "Kevin Conner"<kconner(a)redhat.com>, "Garvin Dean"<garvin.dean(a)amentra.com>, "Edgar A Silva"<edgar.silva(a)redhat.com>, "Prakasha Aradhya"<paradhya(a)redhat.com>, "Max Andersen"<manderse(a)redhat.com>, "Trevor Kirby"<tkirby(a)redhat.com> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 12:46:36 PM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain Subject: Re: UPDATE: Assistance in testing JBDS with SOA-P Just tried it here on JBESB 4.4 and SOA-P 4.3 with JBDS 3.0CR1 and works for me. Burr: Maybe you and I should set up a time to go through this together? :) -- John On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 20:25 +0100, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > Works for me and Aaron praised the feature to me in email over the > weekend so someone besides me has too ;) > > /max > >> I wasn't able to get this to work but I suspect I missed a step in >> the integration. >> >> Has anybody gotten this to work? >> >> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> >>>> 2) It is not clear how to create an esb archive and deploy it to jbossesb. Is this functionality supported in this release? >>>> >>>> >>> File> New> ESB Project >>> >>> (add whatever you want to run) >>> >>> Right click project> Run As...> Run on server >>> (or right click server> Add and remove projects) >>> >>> Done. Standard way of deploying applications in WTP. >>> >>> /max >>> >>>> Any documentation? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "John Graham"<jgraham(a)redhat.com> >>>> To: "Mark Little"<mlittle(a)redhat.com>, "Mark Proctor"<mproctor(a)redhat.com>, "Kris Verlaenen"<kverlaen(a)redhat.com>, "Koen Aers"<kaers(a)redhat.com>, "Burr Sutter"<bsutter(a)redhat.com>, "Leonard Dimaggio"<ldimaggi(a)redhat.com>, "Kevin Conner"<kconner(a)redhat.com>, "Jeffrey Delong"<jdelong(a)redhat.com>, "Garvin Dean"<garvin.dean(a)amentra.com>, "Edgar A Silva"<edgar.silva(a)redhat.com>, "Prakasha Aradhya"<paradhya(a)redhat.com>, "Max Andersen"<manderse(a)redhat.com>, "Trevor Kirby"<tkirby(a)redhat.com> >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 12:30:09 PM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain >>>> Subject: UPDATE: Assistance in testing JBDS with SOA-P >>>> >>>> Following up: >>>> >>>> 1. I should have prefaced the original message with "Please feel free to >>>> forward to anyone else (internal to RH/JB or under the appropriate >>>> agreements for this sort of internal information) who you might think >>>> would be interested in testing." If you do, please let me know, so I can >>>> add them into the list of people receiving these email updates. >>>> >>>> 2. Related to (1): Why not just use a mailing list like soa-tools? There >>>> are a couple of reasons: (a) There is no single list, or small set of >>>> lists, that covers everyone involved (and, no, I am not sending this >>>> request to thecore ;) ), (b) this is a short term, focused request, (c) >>>> list requests are like talking to a stadium of people, whereas this >>>> subset shows that I am talking to *you* :) >>>> >>>> 3. (Thanks, Len and Trev!) For the SOA-P download please use: >>>> http://jawa05.englab.brq.redhat.com/released/soa-p-4.3.0.GA/ >>>> >>>> 4. (Thanks, Max, Len, and Jeff!) Ignore the "all plug-ins" zips for the >>>> tooling, and use the installer jar instead. You might find that your >>>> browser attempts to open this jar directly instead of downloading it, in >>>> which case you'll need to do a "save as" on the installer jar. Once >>>> downloaded, from the command line issue "java -jar ...." with the jar >>>> name to start the installer. >>>> >>>> 5. If you test but don't find any problems, still please drop an email >>>> to Max and I saying that you've tried. Since "no response" does not mean >>>> "tried it and found no problems to report," these notes will help Max >>>> and I determine the test coverage in place for this combination. >>>> >>>> 6. Particular importance of this JBDS release: This is the release that >>>> we'll take to EclipseCon in March, and we'd like to push it hard, >>>> especially in the SOA area. We just need to be sure that what we push >>>> doesn't fall over. :) >>>> >>>> Thanks again! >>>> John >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 15:54 -0500, John Graham wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> As we reach the final stages of the JBoss Developer Studio (JBDS) 2.0 >>>>> release, we are seeking help in testing the JBDS/SOA-P combination. In >>>>> particular, we're interested in how the jBPM and Drools distributions >>>>> bundled in the SOA-P product work with JBDS. >>>>> >>>>> So, while testing and feedback at any stage is appreciated, the critical >>>>> period for release will be over the next 10 days or so. Any timely >>>>> feedback will help us to improve the tooling offered for this product >>>>> configuration. >>>>> >>>>> The specific builds of each: >>>>> >>>>> * JBDS 2.0: Use >>>>> http://reports.qa.atl.jboss.com/binaries/RHDS/release/2.0.0.CR1/200812221... >>>>> via the installer. (EAP is optional.) >>>>> >>>>> * SOA-P: Use >>>>> http://jawa05.englab.brq.redhat.com/candidate/soa-4.3.0.GA_IR5/ >>>>> (SOA team: this is the link that was provided to JBDS QE a while ago; if >>>>> a later build should be used, please let us know in this thread.) >>>>> >>>>> If any questions come up during testing, it probably is best to use the >>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org mailing list, since that will get the >>>>> most people in the most time zones. (Of course there's always JIRA for >>>>> bugs.) >>>>> >>>>> A number of people on thread have tested various milestones of this JBDS >>>>> release, and the input has been very valuable. We hope each of you can >>>>> spare a few cycles to help us wrap up testing for this product >>>>> combination. >>>>> >>>>> -- John >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>