On 13 May 2014, at 13:25, Angelo zerr wrote:
2014-05-13 12:17 GMT+02:00 Max Rydahl Andersen
<manderse(a)redhat.com>:
> On 13 May 2014, at 9:13, Angelo zerr wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>>
>> Thank's for your answer. But you wish to give up one day JSDT?
>>
>
> no, because JSDT offers more than any of these do and JSDT facets
> etc. are
> *required* for wtp projects.
>
> neither tern or vjet could work without JSDT.
>
> Fixing/replacing how parsing/valdiation is done in JSDT is the goal -
> not
> about removing jsdt (which is more than just parsing/valdiation)
>
> Ok I understand. For your information, I have started validation (not
syntax validation) with tern :
https://github.com/angelozerr/tern.java/wiki/Tern-&-Validation
which is based on JS tern plugin
https://github.com/angelozerr/tern.lintwhich works with editor like
CodeMirror.
So if I run with this I will get double validation errors if validation
from JSDT aren't disabled, right?
/max
Regards Angelo
> /max
>
>
> I hope tern.javaI will one day provide the same cool feature than
> VJET
>> like
>>
https://wiki.eclipse.org/VJET/Code_Assistance_Features
>>
>
> Very impressive!
>>
>> Regards Angelo
>>
>>
>> 2014-05-12 18:34 GMT+02:00 Max Rydahl Andersen
>> <manderse(a)redhat.com>:
>>
>> On 12 May 2014, at 18:26, Angelo zerr wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi JBoss guys,
>>>>
>>>> I have noticed that you had integrated VJET last year. I have
>>>> never
>>>>
>>> played
>>>
>>>> with VJET, but I have seen features screenshot of VJET (like
>>>> object
>>>> litteral validation) and it seems very powerful.
>>>>
>>>> My goal is to try to implement the same feature than VJET, but I'm
>>>> very
>>>> curious why you decided to integrate and contribute to tern.java
>>>> although
>>>> you have VJET.
>>>>
>>>
>>> because vjet haven't moved anywhere and still relies on jsdt for
>>> its
>>> parsing.
>>>
>>>
>>> thats the short version.
>>>
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
http://about.me/maxandersen
>>>
>>>
>
> /max
>
http://about.me/maxandersen
>
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen