Hi JBoss guys, I have noticed that you had integrated VJET last year. I have never played with VJET, but I have seen features screenshot of VJET (like object litteral validation) and it seems very powerful. My goal is to try to implement the same feature than VJET, but I'm very curious why you decided to integrate and contribute to tern.java although you have VJET.

Hi Max, Thank's for your answer. But you wish to give up one day JSDT?

I hope tern.javaI will one day provide the same cool feature than VJET like https://wiki.eclipse.org/VJET/Code_Assistance_Features

Very impressive! Regards Angelo 2014-05-12 18:34 GMT+02:00 Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt;: > On 12 May 2014, at 18:26, Angelo zerr wrote: > >> Hi JBoss guys, >> >> I have noticed that you had integrated VJET last year. I have never > played >> with VJET, but I have seen features screenshot of VJET (like object >> litteral validation) and it seems very powerful. >> >> My goal is to try to implement the same feature than VJET, but I'm >> very >> curious why you decided to integrate and contribute to tern.java >> although >> you have VJET. > > because vjet haven't moved anywhere and still relies on jsdt for its > parsing. > > > thats the short version. > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen >

2014-05-13 12:17 GMT+02:00 Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt;: > On 13 May 2014, at 9:13, Angelo zerr wrote: > > Hi Max, >> >> Thank's for your answer. But you wish to give up one day JSDT? >> > > no, because JSDT offers more than any of these do and JSDT facets > etc. are > *required* for wtp projects. > > neither tern or vjet could work without JSDT. > > Fixing/replacing how parsing/valdiation is done in JSDT is the goal - > not > about removing jsdt (which is more than just parsing/valdiation) > > Ok I understand. For your information, I have started validation (not syntax validation) with tern : https://github.com/angelozerr/tern.java/wiki/Tern-&-Validation which is based on JS tern plugin https://github.com/angelozerr/tern.lintwhich works with editor like CodeMirror.

Regards Angelo > /max > > > I hope tern.javaI will one day provide the same cool feature than > VJET >> like >> https://wiki.eclipse.org/VJET/Code_Assistance_Features >> > > Very impressive! >> >> Regards Angelo >> >> >> 2014-05-12 18:34 GMT+02:00 Max Rydahl Andersen >> <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt;: >> >> On 12 May 2014, at 18:26, Angelo zerr wrote: >>> >>> Hi JBoss guys, >>>> >>>> I have noticed that you had integrated VJET last year. I have >>>> never >>>> >>> played >>> >>>> with VJET, but I have seen features screenshot of VJET (like >>>> object >>>> litteral validation) and it seems very powerful. >>>> >>>> My goal is to try to implement the same feature than VJET, but I'm >>>> very >>>> curious why you decided to integrate and contribute to tern.java >>>> although >>>> you have VJET. >>>> >>> >>> because vjet haven't moved anywhere and still relies on jsdt for >>> its >>> parsing. >>> >>> >>> thats the short version. >>> >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> >>> > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen >

2014-05-13 13:40 GMT+02:00 Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt;: > On 13 May 2014, at 13:25, Angelo zerr wrote: > > 2014-05-13 12:17 GMT+02:00 Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt;: >> >> On 13 May 2014, at 9:13, Angelo zerr wrote: >>> >>> Hi Max, >>> >>>> >>>> Thank's for your answer. But you wish to give up one day JSDT? >>>> >>>> >>> no, because JSDT offers more than any of these do and JSDT facets >>> etc. >>> are >>> *required* for wtp projects. >>> >>> neither tern or vjet could work without JSDT. >>> >>> Fixing/replacing how parsing/valdiation is done in JSDT is the goal >>> - not >>> about removing jsdt (which is more than just parsing/valdiation) >>> >>> Ok I understand. For your information, I have started validation >>> (not >>> >> syntax validation) with tern : >> https://github.com/angelozerr/tern.java/wiki/Tern-&-Validation >> >> which is based on JS tern plugin >> https://github.com/angelozerr/tern.lintwhich works with editor like >> CodeMirror. >> > > So if I run with this I will get double validation errors if > validation > from JSDT aren't disabled, right? > Right. But tern.lint doesn't validate the same feature than JSDT : * validate "Unkown property" * validate "Unkown identtifier" * will validate string value according JS framework (ex : var a = require('XXX') will show an error for XXX which is not a known node module

Perhaps in the future, tern.lint will able to validate syntax error, but I would like to manage severity for each validation rules ('warning', error, ignore).

So you will able to disbale if you wish some error coming from tern.lint (see https://github.com/angelozerr/tern.lint/issues/4)

> > /max > > > >> Regards Angelo >> >> >> /max >>> >>> >>> I hope tern.javaI will one day provide the same cool feature than >>> VJET >>> >>>> like >>>> https://wiki.eclipse.org/VJET/Code_Assistance_Features >>>> >>>> >>> Very impressive! >>> >>>> >>>> Regards Angelo >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-05-12 18:34 GMT+02:00 Max Rydahl Andersen >>>> <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt;: >>>> >>>> On 12 May 2014, at 18:26, Angelo zerr wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi JBoss guys, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I have noticed that you had integrated VJET last year. I have >>>>>> never >>>>>> >>>>>> played >>>>> >>>>> with VJET, but I have seen features screenshot of VJET (like >>>>> object >>>>>> litteral validation) and it seems very powerful. >>>>>> >>>>>> My goal is to try to implement the same feature than VJET, but >>>>>> I'm >>>>>> very >>>>>> curious why you decided to integrate and contribute to tern.java >>>>>> although >>>>>> you have VJET. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> because vjet haven't moved anywhere and still relies on jsdt for >>>>> its >>>>> parsing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> thats the short version. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> /max >>>>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> >>> > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen >