We still need to keep the EJB3 Classpath Container for potential POJPs..
getting rid of everything else is A-OK with me though..
Rob Stryker wrote:
I'm inclined to believe we should just get rid of our ejb3
implementation. It serves no purpose now and keeping it around can
only confuse users.
It's purpose was to provide an ejb3-light facet, which could then be
combined with the dynamic web facet to make a seam project.
We already have a seam project. And a seam facet. Neither of which
uses the ejb3 facet from what I can tell. Therefore the jboss ejb3
project, and its facet, has become useless.
--
Marshall Culpepper
Redhat Dev Studio, JBoss Tools
-
http://jboss.org/tools
email: marshall(a)jboss.org
skype: marshall.culpepper