Re: [jbosstools-dev] Need to find a better solution than taking latest trunk and push to examples site

> Sorry for the hiccup, > > Well this is not a svn/publishing issue IMHO (I triggered the publishing job manually) aah - good and bad to hear ;) good that it wasn't automated and bad to hear it was manually triggered. > what we really need to do is use separate descriptors for different released versions. This is already the case for JBT (where http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/download.jboss.org/jbosst... is pretty safe), but not for JBDS, and that went bad. for dev releases - yeah this makes sense, but what when we go for maintanence then the intent is that these should not be named differently as otherwise those on 5.0.0 won't see changes done for 5.0.1 and vice versa. /max > Regards, > > Fred Bricon > > Le 18/01/2012 14:50, Max Rydahl Andersen a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> Today Fred was experimenting with changing project examples for some improvements in B1. >> >> That included renaming some categories which he changed, committed to svn trunk and then later today >> I got 1,2,3 and now 4 mails about examples being broken in M5. >> >> Why ? >> Because we have some automatic update script running that takes whatever is latest in trunk and pushes to the examples site. >> >> We really need to find a better solution for this! >> >> I say *disable* the job and have it only update at controlled times - not automatically. >> Anything that needs to use it should have a flag/property to override the urls needed to do local testing. >> >> But I know that does not scale well - anyone with a bright idea on how to fix this better ? >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen