Re: [jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

Rob Stryker wrote: > ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/... > Unfortunately I do not see there org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_64_1.8.1.3-20080312.jar plugin. <ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/plug... /sergey <ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/plug... > > Sergey Vasilyev wrote: >> Rob Stryker wrote: >>> Or we should have used the official releases by ATF, who *did* >>> compile 1.8.1.3 and who released it. >> Rob, could you please provide me with a link to 1.8.1.3 x86_64 >> xulrunner plugin provided by ATF? >> >> /sergey >>> >>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>>> So we should actually just have moved to 1.8.1.4 when we realized >>>> that ? >>>> >>>> /max >>>> >>>> >>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This should be up to the VPE team to decide. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would prefer one version used across the board. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why was 1.8.1.4 used instead of 1.8.1.3 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Because we weren't able to compile 1.8.1.3 version on x86 platform. >>>>> >>>>> /sergey >>>>> >>>>>> /max >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at >>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) >>>>>>> use a >>>>>>> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools >>>>>>> releases. >>>>>>> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the >>>>>>> standard 1.8.1.3 >>>>>>> used in windows, linux, and osx. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the >>>>>>> update >>>>>>> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make >>>>>>> sure this is >>>>>>> a possibility for GA. Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... >>>>>>> but with >>>>>>> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone >>>>>>> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the >>>>>>> file in >>>>>>> the plugins folder. Not exactly a great situation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Rob Stryker >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >