6:30 p.m.
Rob and I were able to verify that the binary patch is working
(apparently reapplying the patch over a currently patched WTP 2.0.2
doesn't work)
I've added and committed the new patch and rolled back our changes to
the seam patch (so jboss-seam.jar is no longer affected). The relevant
build status link is here:
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/JBoss_Dev_Studio_Release/10/
8:55 p.m.
On Tue, 06 May 2008 01:30:02 +0200, Marshall Culpepper
<marshall.culpepper(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Rob and I were able to verify that the binary patch is working
(apparently reapplying the patch over a currently patched WTP 2.0.2
doesn't work)
So what does this mean for JBoss Tools users ? What should they do to get the better WTP
?
/max
9:54 p.m.
1) download wtp 2.0.2 release and unzip it.
2) download our patch and unzip it
- fin
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
On Tue, 06 May 2008 01:30:02 +0200, Marshall Culpepper
<marshall.culpepper(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Rob and I were able to verify that the binary patch is working
> (apparently reapplying the patch over a currently patched WTP 2.0.2
> doesn't work)
>
So what does this mean for JBoss Tools users ? What should they do to get the better WTP
?
/max
12:34 a.m.
and all those who have wtp 2.0.2+wtp patch does what ?
/max
1) download wtp 2.0.2 release and unzip it.
2) download our patch and unzip it
- fin
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 01:30:02 +0200, Marshall Culpepper
<marshall.culpepper(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Rob and I were able to verify that the binary patch is working
>> (apparently reapplying the patch over a currently patched WTP 2.0.2
>> doesn't work)
>>
>
> So what does this mean for JBoss Tools users ? What should they do to get the better
WTP ?
>
> /max
>
>
12:37 a.m.
Anyone who's already at the point of having wtp2.0.2 installed *and*
manually installed our patch is probably very able to re-install a fresh
eclipse + wtp2.0.2 + our patch instead.
Just my conjecture.
- RS
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
and all those who have wtp 2.0.2+wtp patch does what ?
/max
> 1) download wtp 2.0.2 release and unzip it.
> 2) download our patch and unzip it
>
> - fin
>
> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 01:30:02 +0200, Marshall Culpepper
<marshall.culpepper(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Rob and I were able to verify that the binary patch is working
>>> (apparently reapplying the patch over a currently patched WTP 2.0.2
>>> doesn't work)
>>>
>>>
>> So what does this mean for JBoss Tools users ? What should they do to get the
better WTP ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>>
>
2:05 a.m.
Well no matter how easy or hard it is it needs to be explained.
I still believe a seperate patch would have been better - but now this is what we have.
My download is still ETA 3 hours so I haven't verified it working yet.
Is the patch standalone available for download somewhere?
-max
Anyone who's already at the point of having wtp2.0.2 installed
*and*
manually installed our patch is probably very able to re-install a fresh
eclipse + wtp2.0.2 + our patch instead.
Just my conjecture.
- RS
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> and all those who have wtp 2.0.2+wtp patch does what ?
>
> /max
>
>
>> 1) download wtp 2.0.2 release and unzip it.
>> 2) download our patch and unzip it
>>
>> - fin
>>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 01:30:02 +0200, Marshall Culpepper
<marshall.culpepper(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Rob and I were able to verify that the binary patch is working
>>>> (apparently reapplying the patch over a currently patched WTP 2.0.2
>>>> doesn't work)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So what does this mean for JBoss Tools users ? What should they do to get the
better WTP ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
11:51 a.m.
http://repository.jboss.org/eclipse/webtools/patches/wtp-P-P2008050600312...
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Well no matter how easy or hard it is it needs to be explained.
I still believe a seperate patch would have been better - but now this is what we have.
My download is still ETA 3 hours so I haven't verified it working yet.
Is the patch standalone available for download somewhere?
-max
> Anyone who's already at the point of having wtp2.0.2 installed *and*
> manually installed our patch is probably very able to re-install a fresh
> eclipse + wtp2.0.2 + our patch instead.
>
> Just my conjecture.
>
> - RS
>
> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>> and all those who have wtp 2.0.2+wtp patch does what ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>>
>>> 1) download wtp 2.0.2 release and unzip it.
>>> 2) download our patch and unzip it
>>>
>>> - fin
>>>
>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 01:30:02 +0200, Marshall Culpepper
<marshall.culpepper(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Rob and I were able to verify that the binary patch is working
>>>>> (apparently reapplying the patch over a currently patched WTP 2.0.2
>>>>> doesn't work)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So what does this mean for JBoss Tools users ? What should they do to get
the better WTP ?
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
12:30 a.m.
Just downloaded and ran simple test with seam 1.2 EAR application.
jboss-tools.jar is not deployed and clean, redeploy and etc. don't help
to to deploy it.
Denis
Marshall Culpepper wrote:
Rob and I were able to verify that the binary patch is working
(apparently reapplying the patch over a currently patched WTP 2.0.2
doesn't work)
I've added and committed the new patch and rolled back our changes to
the seam patch (so jboss-seam.jar is no longer affected). The relevant
build status link is here:
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/JBoss_Dev_Studio_Release/10/
6079
days inactive
6080
days old
jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Denis Golovin -
Marshall Culpepper -
Max Rydahl Andersen -
Rob Stryker