Yes, Max. I follow the wtp-dev mailing lists and told on this alternative at F2F Meeting in Brno. This requires to have a modified Rhino to be shipped along with this fork of JSDT. John Peberdy asked wtp-people for feedback on his JSDT-fork. They told that they aren't interested in getting the JS objects info by executing the scripts. At the moment the fork is not a candidate to be a proposal for eclipse. JSDT Validation Builder is disabled (at least proposed to be made disabled) on a project because the fork has (if I'm correct) its own validation. So probably it true that its validation is less strict than the JSDT one. Gorkem played with this project in days of F2F Meeting. Probably he's able to say more. Victor On 02/11/2013 08:12 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > Hi, > > After I nudge on WTP-dev to get eclipse JSDT issues we got patches for included in M6 I realized > there is now also https://bitbucket.org/nexj/webtools.jsdt.core/ as an alternative to VJET. > > Victor/Denis - have you looked/tried that ? (see wtp-dev mailing list for discussions about it) > It seem to be less strict in its java script checking. > > /max >